Literature DB >> 18567591

The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Brian C J Moore1.   

Abstract

Compression is used in hearing aids to compensate for the effects of loudness recruitment. This article describes the distinction between, and relative merits of, slow and fast compression systems. A study of Gatehouse and coworkers leads to the following conclusions: (a) The benefit from compression is greatest among individuals who experience a wide range of sound levels within short periods of time, (b) slow compression generally leads to higher listening comfort than fast compression, (c) the benefit from fast compression varies across individuals, and those with high cognitive ability are able to benefit from fast compression to take advantage of temporal dips in a background sound. It is argued that listening in the dips depends on the ability to process the temporal fine structure of sounds. It is proposed that a test of the ability to process temporal fine structure might be useful for selecting compression speed for an individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567591      PMCID: PMC4111434          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808317819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  41 in total

1.  Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.

Authors:  M A Stone; B C Moore; J I Alcántara; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with.

Authors:  Tim Van den Bogaert; Thomas J Klasen; Marc Moonen; Lieselot Van Deun; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Compression and its effect on the speech signal.

Authors:  J Verschuure; A J Maas; E Stikvoort; R M de Jong; A Goedegebure; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

9.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function.

Authors:  R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  28 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-06

3.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.

Authors:  Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza; James Kates; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effect of hearing-aid compression on judgments of relative distance.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.