Literature DB >> 15004650

Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Lena L N Wong1, Louise Hickson, Bradley McPherson.   

Abstract

Hearing aid satisfaction is a pleasurable emotional experience as an outcome of an evaluation of performance. Many tools have been designed to measure the degree of satisfaction overall, or along the dimensions of cost, appearance, acoustic benefit, comfort, and service. Various studies have used these tools to examine the relationships between satisfaction and other factors. Findings are not always consistent across studies, but in general, hearing aid satisfaction has been found to be related to experience, expectation, personality and attitude, usage, type of hearing aids, sound quality, listening situations, and problems in hearing aid use. Inconsistent findings across studies and difficulties in evaluating the underlying relationships are probably caused by problems with the tools (eg, lack of validity) and the methods used to evaluate relationships (eg, correlation analyses evaluate association and not causal effect). Whether satisfaction changes over time and how service satisfaction contributes to device satisfaction are unclear. It is hoped that this review will help readers understand current satisfaction measures, how various factors affect satisfaction, and how the way satisfaction is measured may be improved to yield more reliable and valid data.

Year:  2003        PMID: 15004650      PMCID: PMC4168909          DOI: 10.1177/108471380300700402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  49 in total

1.  Validation of the SADL questionnaire.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The hearing aid revolution: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Agnete Parving
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Longitudinal changes in hearing aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years after hearing aid delivery.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Wilson; Nancy N Barlow; Carolyn B Garner; Nathan Amos
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Measures for the assessment of hearing aid provision and rehabilitation.

Authors:  D N Brooks
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-08

Review 5.  Fundamental issues in self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  R L Schow; S Gatehouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Use and benefit of hearing aids in the tenth decade--and beyond.

Authors:  A Parving; B Philip
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991

7.  The time course of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  A R Horwitz; C W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Development of the Three-Clinic Hearing Aid Selection Profile (HASP).

Authors:  G P Jacobson; C W Newman; D A Fabry; S A Sandridge
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The effect of pre-fitting counselling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings.

Authors:  M Norman; C R George; D McCarthy
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

10.  Accuracy of hearing aid use time as reported by experienced hearing aid wearers.

Authors:  L B Taubman; C V Palmer; J D Durrant; S Pratt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  21 in total

1.  Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.

Authors:  Laya Poost-Foroosh; Mary Beth Jennings; Lynn Shaw; Christine N Meston; Margaret F Cheesman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 3.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

4.  Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users.

Authors:  Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Joseph A Istvan; Judy A Andrews; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.

Authors:  Theresa Hnath Chisolm; Colleen M Noe; Rachel McArdle; Harvey Abrams
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

6.  Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

Authors:  ShienPei Silverman; Megan Cates; Gabrielle Saunders
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 7.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

8.  Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.

Authors:  Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz; Ömer Bayır; Serap Er; Eray Işık; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Ali Özdek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].

Authors:  J Kießling; S Kreikemeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.