Literature DB >> 15678225

Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

King Chung1.   

Abstract

This review discusses the challenges in hearing aid design and fitting and the recent developments in advanced signal processing technologies to meet these challenges. The first part of the review discusses the basic concepts and the building blocks of digital signal processing algorithms, namely, the signal detection and analysis unit, the decision rules, and the time constants involved in the execution of the decision. In addition, mechanisms and the differences in the implementation of various strategies used to reduce the negative effects of noise are discussed. These technologies include the microphone technologies that take advantage of the spatial differences between speech and noise and the noise reduction algorithms that take advantage of the spectral difference and temporal separation between speech and noise. The specific technologies discussed in this paper include first-order directional microphones, adaptive directional microphones, second-order directional microphones, microphone matching algorithms, array microphones, multichannel adaptive noise reduction algorithms, and synchrony detection noise reduction algorithms. Verification data for these technologies, if available, are also summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15678225      PMCID: PMC4111442          DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  64 in total

1.  Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in school-aged children.

Authors:  F K Kuk; C Kollofski; S Brown; A Melum; A Rosenthal
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument.

Authors:  M Boymans; W A Dreschler; P Schoneveld; H Verschuure
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

3.  Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.

Authors:  T Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference.

Authors:  Rauna K Surr; Brian E Walden; Mary T Cord; Laurel Olson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.

Authors:  J S Gravel; N Fausel; C Liskow; J Chobot
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Use of microphone technology to improve user performance in noise.

Authors:  M Valente
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-09

7.  Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones.

Authors:  M Valente; D A Fabry; L G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D E Morgan; J R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1982-05

9.  Evaluation of an adaptive directional system in a DSP hearing aid.

Authors:  Ruth A Bentler; Jill L Tubbs; Jessica L M Egge; Gregory A Flamme; Andrew B Dittberner
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life.

Authors:  Mary T Cord; Rauna K Surr; Brian E Walden; Laurel Olson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

4.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Jianfen Ma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  From the editor.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

7.  Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reducing the impact of wind noise on cochlear implant processors with two microphones.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Casey Cox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Stephanie Bor
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.