Literature DB >> 6688434

Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

Y C Tong, P J Blamey, R C Dowell, G M Clark.   

Abstract

This paper reports further psychophysical studies on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy which converts the acoustic fundamental frequency to electric repetition rate, the second-formant frequency to electrode position, and the acoustic amplitude to current level. The first four studies evaluated the use of a special pulse pattern to minimize the loudness variation with electric repetition rate. The chosen pulse pattern consisted of multiple pulses occurring in the first half of each repetitive period (MPP) in contrast to the more conventional pattern with a single pulse per period (SPP). The results showed that MPP approximately equalized the loudness variation with repetition rate. The dynamic range of current, the pitch variation with repetition rate, and the difference limens for repetition rate were found to be similar to MPP and SPP. Two other studies investigated interaction between electrode position and repetition rate (RR). The first of these showed that the patient could make use of information provided by rising or falling RR trajectories superimposed on individual electrodes or electrode trajectories as an indicator of the direction of intonation variation. The second of these studies showed that the dissimilarities amongst the hearing sensations produced by steady-state stimuli differing in electrode position and repetition rate were characterized by two perceptual components, relating to the two electric parameters, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6688434     DOI: 10.1121/1.389620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-27

3.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  The multichannel cochlear implant for severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  The relationship between time and place coding with cochlear implants with long electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Jeremy Marozeau; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

8.  Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Griet Mertens; Andrea Kleine Punte; Paul Van De Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.