Literature DB >> 15735871

Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

King Chung1.   

Abstract

This is the second part of a review on the challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Feedback and the occlusion effect pose great challenges in hearing aid design and usage. Yet, conventional solutions to feedback and the occlusion effect often create a dilemma: the solution to one often leads to the other. This review discusses the advanced signal processing strategies to reduce feedback and some new approaches to reduce the occlusion effect. Specifically, the causes of three types of feedback (acoustic, mechanical, and electromagnetic) are discussed. The strategies currently used to reduce acoustic feedback (i.e., adaptive feedback reduction algorithms using adaptive gain reduction, notch filtering, and phase cancellation strategies) and the design of new receivers that are built to reduce mechanical and electromagnetic feedback are explained. In addition, various new strategies (i.e., redesigned sound delivery devices and receiver-in-the-ear-canal hearing aid configuration) to reduce the occlusion effect are reviewed. Many manufacturers have recently adopted laser shell-manufacturing technologies to overcome problems associated with manufacturing custom hearing aid shells. The mechanisms of selected laser sintering and stereo lithographic apparatus and the properties of custom shells produced by these two processes are reviewed. Further, various new developments in hearing aid transducers, telecoils, channel-free amplification, open-platform programming options, rechargeable hearing aids, ear-level frequency modulated (FM) receivers, wireless Bluetooth FM systems, and wireless programming options are briefly explained and discussed. Finally, the applications of advanced hearing aid technologies to enhance other devices such as cochlear implants, hearing protectors, and cellular phones are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15735871      PMCID: PMC4111464          DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  18 in total

1.  Variations in the feedback of hearing aids.

Authors:  J Hellgren; T Lunner; S Arlinger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.

Authors:  B Rafaely; M Roccasalva-Firenze; E Payne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of a digital feedback suppression system for acoustical telephone communication.

Authors:  M Latzel; T M Gebhart; J Kiessling
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  2001

4.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

5.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I.

Authors:  M ter Keurs; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

7.  Acoustic feedback margin improvements in hearing instruments using a prototype DFS (digital feedback suppression) system.

Authors:  O Dyrlund; N Bisgaard
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1991

8.  Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm.

Authors:  A M Engebretson; M French-St George
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1993

9.  Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response.

Authors:  R M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Tolerable hearing aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Innovative technology in hearing instruments: matching needs in the developing world.

Authors:  Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 3.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 4.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  From the editor.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

6.  Temporal-Bone Measurements of the Maximum Equivalent Pressure Output and Maximum Stable Gain of a Light-Driven Hearing System That Mechanically Stimulates the Umbo.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; Peter Luke Santa Maria; Rodney Perkins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A micro-drive hearing aid: a novel non-invasive hearing prosthesis actuator.

Authors:  Peyton Elizabeth Paulick; Mark W Merlo; Hossein Mahboubi; Hamid R Djalilian; Mark Bachman
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Stephanie Bor
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Investigation of a novel completely-in-the-canal direct-drive hearing device: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Peyton Paulick; Saman Kiumehr; Mark Merlo; Mark Bachman; Hamid Reza Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.