Literature DB >> 25190428

Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.

Hussnain Ali1, Oldooz Hazrati1, Emily A Tobey2, John H L Hansen3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization (ADRO) on speech identification for cochlear implant (CI) users in adverse listening conditions. In this study, anechoic quiet, noisy, reverberant, noisy reverberant, and reverberant noisy conditions are evaluated. Two scenarios are considered when modeling the combined effects of reverberation and noise: (a) noise is added to the reverberant speech, and (b) noisy speech is reverberated. CI users were tested in different listening environments using IEEE sentences presented at 65 dB sound pressure level. No significant effect of ADRO processing on speech intelligibility was observed.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190428      PMCID: PMC4144166          DOI: 10.1121/1.4893334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.

Authors:  M L Hughes; C J Brown; P J Abbas; A A Wolaver; J P Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chris J James; Peter J Blamey; Lois Martin; Brett Swanson; Yvette Just; David Macfarlane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M Dorman; J Fitzke
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

7.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology.

Authors:  Takako Iwaki; Peter Blamey; Takeshi Kubo
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski; F M Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.