Literature DB >> 23408020

Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Isabelle Mosnier1, Mathieu Marx, Frederic Venail, Natalie Loundon, Samantha Roux-Vaillard, Olivier Sterkers.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure performance benefits obtained by upgrading recipients of the Cochlear Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant to the new CP810 sound processor. Speech recognition in quiet and in spatially separated noise was measured in established users of the Cochlear ESPrit 3G (n = 22) and Freedom (n = 13) sound processors, using the "Everyday" listening program. Subjects were then upgraded to the CP810 processor and were re-assessed after a 3-month period, using both the "Everyday" program and the new "Noise" program, which incorporates several pre-processing features including a new directional microphone algorithm ("Zoom"). Subjective perceptions were also recorded using the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. Mean scores for monosyllables in quiet, presented at 50 and 60 dB SPL, increased by 11% (p < 0.0001) and 8% (p < 0.001), respectively, after upgrade, for all subjects combined. Significant increases were also recorded for both processor groups. In noise, the mean scores were 60.0 and 67.4% for the original and CP810 Everyday programs, respectively (difference not significant). With the CP810 Noise programs the mean score increased to 82.5% (p < 0.01), with significant increases in both processor groups. There was evidence of slightly greater upgrade benefit in users of the ESPrit 3G processor and in relatively poor performers. The APHAB questionnaire also indicated significant reduction in perceived difficulty in the background noise and reverberation sub-scales after upgrade. The findings of the study appear to support the expectation of increased benefit from the new CP810 sound processor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408020     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2381-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

2.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.

Authors:  P W Dawson; A E Vandali; M R Knight; J M Heasman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; T Kortmann; U Hoppe; H Hessel; A Morsnowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures.

Authors:  Ruth A Bentler; Diane P Niebuhr; Tiffany A Johnson; Gregory A Flamme
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Samantha Powell; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cochlear implant characteristics and speech perception skills of adolescents with long-term device use.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Christine Brenner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Amy P Olund; Melissa Dejong
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Heldner; Hans Mülder; Emily Ward; Brandon Vincent
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  The effect of instantaneous input dynamic range setting on the speech perception of children with the nucleus 24 implant.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Margaret W Skinner; Beth A Holstad; Beverly T Fears; Marie K Richter; Margaret Matusofsky; Christine Brenner; Timothy Holden; Amy Birath; Jerrica L Kettel; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hearing restoration: Graeme Clark, Ingeborg Hochmair, and Blake Wilson receive the 2013 Lasker~DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award.

Authors:  Corinne Williams
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen; Ghizlene Lahlou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Nathalie Mathias; Jonathan Flament; Dorith Amar; Amelie Liagre-Callies; Stephanie Borel; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Olivier Sterkers; Daniele Bernardeschi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Speech comprehension across multiple CI processor generations: Scene dependent signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Britta Böhnke; Alexander Mewes; Patrick Munder; Stefan J Mauger; Thomas Hocke
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-15

5.  Ecological Momentary Assessment to Obtain Signal Processing Technology Preference in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Adam A Hersbach; Thomas Hocke; Stefan J Mauger; Britta Böhnke; Alexander Mewes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  A clinical assessment of cochlear implant recipient performance: implications for individualized map settings in specific environments.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Thomas Hocke; Stefan Mauger; Joachim Müller-Deile
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.

Authors:  Clemens Honeder; Rudolfs Liepins; Christoph Arnoldner; Hana Šinkovec; Alexandra Kaider; Erich Vyskocil; Dominik Riss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 CP810 Sound Processor.

Authors:  Norbert Dillier; Wai Kong Lai
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-10-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.