Literature DB >> 15988586

Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA.

Francesco Fraioli1, Carlo Catalano, Alessandro Napoli, Marco Francone, Fiammetta Venditti, Massimiliano Danti, Federica Pediconi, Roberto Passariello.   

Abstract

To investigate the possibility of reducing X-ray exposure during multidetector-row spiral computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography and to compare the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of different dosages with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremities vessels. Seventy-five patients, randomly divided into three groups of 25 patients each, were evaluated for atherosclerotic disease with four-row spiral CT angiography (4x2.5 mm) and DSA. MDCT scanning parameters were kept constant, except for milliamperage (mAs): group A: 50 mAs; group B: 100 mAs; group C: 130 mAs. Images were analysed by two vascular radiologists in consensus. DSA represented the standard of reference. The diagnostic value of MDCT and total radiation exposure were evaluated for each data set. The simulated effective dose was 3.7 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.2 mSv for 100 mAs and 13.7 mSv for 130 mAs for men, and 4 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.9 mSv for 100 mAs and 14.8 mSv for 130 mAs for women. The dose reduction was 74% for group A and 40% for group B. The evaluation of the presence and degree of stenoses revealed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 96%, 94%, 95%, 83% and 99% for Group A (50 mAs), 96%, 96%, 96%, 89% and 99% for Group B (100 mAs) and 98%, 96%, 97%, 91% and 100% for the standard dose protocol, Group C (130 mAs). Low-dose scanning is thus a feasible and accurate option for four-row CT angiography of the peripheral vessels. This technique provides substantial reduction of the radiation dose delivered to the patient while maintaining optimal diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988586     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2812-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; G Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner.

Authors:  M Mahesh; J C Scatarige; J Cooper; E K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; D Lepori; Pascal Monnin; Jean-François Valley; Pierre Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions.

Authors:  R J Scheck; E M Coppenrath; M W Kellner; K J Lehmann; C Rock; J Rieger; L Rothmeier; F Schweden; A A Bäuml; K Hahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations.

Authors:  D E Ware; W Huda; P J Mergo; A L Litwiller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients.

Authors:  J T Winterer; J Laubenberger; K Scheffler; K Neumann; Y R Bayraktarli; K H Allmann; P Uhrmeister; M Langer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Riccardo Iannaccone; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; James A Brink; Filippo Mangiapane; Simona Trenna; Francesca Piacentini; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers.

Authors:  Stefan Diederich; Michael Thomas; Michael Semik; Horst Lenzen; Nikolaus Roos; Anushe Weber; Walter Heindel; Dag Wormanns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  16 in total

1.  How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level.

Authors:  A Aroua; H Rickli; J-C Stauffer; P Schnyder; P R Trueb; J-F Valley; P Vock; F R Verdun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Joshua Burrill; Zaid Dabbagh; Frank Gollub; Mohamed Hamady
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Victor A Ferrari; Corey Goldman; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John P Reilly; George P Rodgers; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Comparison between 64-row CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the study of lower extremities: personal experience.

Authors:  S Cernic; F Pozzi Mucelli; A Pellegrin; R Pizzolato; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Kau; Wolfgang Eicher; Christian Reiterer; Martin Niedermayer; Egon Rabitsch; Birgit Senft; Klaus A Hausegger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Extremity CTA for penetrating trauma: 10-year experience using a 64-detector row CT scanner.

Authors:  Charles G Colip; Varun Gorantla; Christina A LeBedis; Jorge A Soto; Stephan W Anderson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 7.  Lower extremity CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: from the established approach to evolving technical developments.

Authors:  Omar Shwaiki; Basem Rashwan; Matthias A Fink; Levester Kirksey; Sameer Gadani; Karunakaravel Karuppasamy; Claudius Melzig; Dustin Thompson; Giuseppe D'Amico; Fabian Rengier; Sasan Partovi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Dose reduction with adaptive bolus chasing computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Zhijun Cai; Er-Wei Bai; Ge Wang; Melhem J Sharafuddin; Hicham T Abada
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 9.  Advances in axial imaging of peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Nandini M Meyersohn; T Gregory Walker; George R Oliveira
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries: value of multidetector CT angiography using an adaptive acquisition method.

Authors:  T Laswed; E Rizzo; D Guntern; F Doenz; A Denys; P Schnyder; S D Qanadli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.