Literature DB >> 26285590

Advances in axial imaging of peripheral vascular disease.

Nandini M Meyersohn1, T Gregory Walker, George R Oliveira.   

Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has become increasingly common in the US patient population and can be a highly symptomatic and significant source of morbidity. When PAD is suspected, the first-line screening study that is obtained is typically a noninvasive evaluation that includes the ankle brachial index (ABI). Following a positive screening study, invasive catheter digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been historically used to image the peripheral artery system and still remains the gold standard. However, newer developments in axial imaging including computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have in large part supplanted DSA for imaging the peripheral artery system in clinical practice. Benefits of CTA include rapid noninvasive acquisition, wide availability, high spatial resolution, and the ability to generate isotropic datasets on 64-detector row and higher CT scanners, thereby allowing for multiplanar 3D reformatting. Drawbacks of CTA include the exposure to both iodinated contrast and ionizing radiation, although the radiation dose exposure is lower than for DSA, and newer techniques such as using low tube voltage and rapid acquisition times allow for lower contrast doses. The presence of vascular calcification also limits the evaluation of small distal arteries using CTA, although the development of dual-energy CT techniques has significantly addressed this issue. Benefits of MRA include the avoidance of exposure to ionizing radiation and high diagnostic accuracy, while drawbacks include limited availability and increased cost along with the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that is associated with gadolinium-based contrast agents, although the latter can be mitigated by using newer non-contrast MR angiography techniques. Future technical advances in CT and MR hardware and software and MR pulse sequences will likely lead to the broader applicability and increased accuracy of noninvasive axial imaging in the evaluation of patients with peripheral artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26285590     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-015-0644-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  28 in total

Review 1.  Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: established techniques.

Authors:  Mitsue Miyazaki; Masaaki Akahane
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Technical considerations for lower limb multidetector computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Aoife N Keeling; Cormac Farrelly; James C Carr; Vahid Yaghmai
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sjoerd Jens; Mark J W Koelemay; Jim A Reekers; Shandra Bipat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography.

Authors:  Rody Ouwendijk; Marianne de Vries; Peter M T Pattynama; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Michiel W de Haan; Theo Stijnen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA.

Authors:  Francesco Fraioli; Carlo Catalano; Alessandro Napoli; Marco Francone; Fiammetta Venditti; Massimiliano Danti; Federica Pediconi; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rosemarie Met; Shandra Bipat; Dink A Legemate; Jim A Reekers; Mark J W Koelemay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Blood Pool Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Correlation to Digital Subtraction Angiography: A Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Martha-Grace Knuttinen; Jillian Karow; Winnie Mar; Margaret Golden; Karen L Xie
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-11-29

10.  Multi-detector row computed tomography angiography of peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Marc C J M Kock; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Peter M T Pattynama; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Arterial Testing: What and When to Use.

Authors:  Derek Mittleider
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  CT-Angiography-Based Outcome Prediction on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients: A Statistical Learning Approach.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Wei Dong; Haonan Guan; Aobuliaximu Yakupu; Hanqi Wang; Liuping Chen; Shuliang Lu; Jiajun Tang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.