Literature DB >> 9771384

Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions.

R J Scheck1, E M Coppenrath, M W Kellner, K J Lehmann, C Rock, J Rieger, L Rothmeier, F Schweden, A A Bäuml, K Hahn.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of radiation dose with image quality in spiral CT. Seven clinical protocols were measured in six different radiological departments provided with four different types of high specification spiral CT scanners. Central and surface absorbed doses were measured in acrylic. The practical CT dose index (PCTDI) was calculated for seven clinical examination protocols and one standardized protocol using identical parameters on four different spiral CT scanners with a dedicated ionization chamber inserted into PMMA phantoms. For low contrast measurements, a cylindrical three-dimensional (3D) phantom (different sized spheres of defined contrast) was used. Image noise was measured with a cylindrical water phantom and high contrast resolution with a Perspex hole phantom. Image quality phantoms were scanned using the parameters of the clinical protocols. Images were randomized, blinded and read by six radiologists (one from each institution). PCTDI values for four different scanners varied up to a factor between 1.5 (centre) and 2.2 (surface) for the standardized protocol. A greater degree of variation was observed for seven clinical examination protocols of the six radiological departments. For example, PCTDI varied up to a factor between 1.7 (cerebrum protocol) and 8.3 (abdomen paediatric protocol). Low contrast resolution correlates closely with dose. An improvement in detection from 8 mm to 4 mm sized spheres needs approximately a ten-fold increase in dose. Noise shows a moderate correlation with PCTDI. High contrast resolution of clinical protocols is independent of PCTDI within a certain range. Differences in modern CT scanner technology seem to be of less importance for radiation exposure than selection of protocol parameters in different radiological institutes. Future discussion on guidelines regarding optimal (patient adapted) tube current for clinical protocols is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9771384     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.847.9771384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Contrast resolution in multidetector-row CT with 16 detector rows: phantom study.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Kichiro Koshida; Masayuki Suzuki; Norio Hayashi; Tadanori Takata; Hideo Tsujii; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-11-01

2.  Urinary calculi: improved detection and characterization with thin-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  Etienne Ketelslegers; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of different dose reduction system in computed tomography for orthodontic applications.

Authors:  E Fanucci; V Fiaschetti; L Ottria; M Mataloni; V Acampora; R Lione; A Barlattani; G Simonetti
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-11-08

4.  Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Georgios V Koukourakis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-28

5.  Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA.

Authors:  Francesco Fraioli; Carlo Catalano; Alessandro Napoli; Marco Francone; Fiammetta Venditti; Massimiliano Danti; Federica Pediconi; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of different patient positioning strategies to minimize shoulder girdle artifacts in head and neck CT.

Authors:  Stefan Wirth; Thomas Meindl; Marcus Treitl; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.

Authors:  Patrizio Barca; Fabio Paolicchi; Giacomo Aringhieri; Federica Palmas; Daniela Marfisi; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Davide Caramella; Marco Giannelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.