Literature DB >> 11058640

Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

W Huda1, E M Scalzetti, G Levin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate how changes in kilovolt peak and milliampere second settings, and patient weight affect transmitted x-ray energy fluence and the image contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at abdominal computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylinders of water were used as patient models, and x-ray spectra, including x-ray tube potentials of 80-140 kVp, were investigated. The mean photon energy and energy fluence transmitted through water cylinders with varying diameters and the image contrast for fat, muscle, bone, and iodine relative to water were determined. The effect of changing the x-ray tube potential on CNR also was investigated.
RESULTS: At a constant kVp, increasing patient weight from 10 kg to 120 kg reduced the transmitted energy fluence by two orders of magnitude. Changing the x-ray tube potential from 80 kVp to 140 kVp increased the mean photon energy from approximately 52 keV to approximately 72 keV and thus reduced the image contrast relative to water by 12% for muscle, 21% for fat, 39% for bone, and 50% for iodine (approximate reduction values). Increasing the x-ray tube potential from 80 kVp to 140 kVp increased the CNR by a factor of 2.6 for muscle and by a factor of 1. 4 for iodine.
CONCLUSION: With changes in patient weight at abdominal CT, x-ray tube potentials must be varied to maintain a constant detector energy fluence. Increasing the x-ray tube potential generally improves CNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11058640     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv35430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  87 in total

1.  Dose and image quality. How does the choice of kilovoltage affect patient dose, scattered radiation, and image quality in CT examinations? Submitted by Glen Thomson, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-12-05

2.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; D Lepori; Pascal Monnin; Jean-François Valley; Pierre Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol.

Authors:  R Gnannt; A Winklehner; R Goetti; B Schmidt; S Kollias; H Alkadhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Brian P Shapiro; Phillip M Young; Birgit Kantor; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Cynthia H McCollough; Thomas C Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of standard- and low-tube voltage MDCT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Kazuo Awai; Takeshi Nakaura; Yumi Yanaga; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose and image quality comparison between prospectively gated axial and retrospectively gated helical coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  C Hlaihel; L Boussel; H Cochet; J A Roch; P Coulon; M J Walker; P C Douek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Dose levels at coronary CT angiography--a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT.

Authors:  J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Tobias B Maurer; Rene Aschenbach; Huedayi Korkusuz; Thomas Lehnert; Simon Deseive; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

10.  Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Jan W Kuiper; Jacob Geleijns; Niels A A Matheijssen; Wouter Teeuwisse; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.