Literature DB >> 15581126

Identification of own-race and other-race faces: implications for the representation of race in face space.

Graham Byatt1, Gillian Rhodes.   

Abstract

Own-race faces are recognized more easily than faces of a different, unfamiliar race. According to the multidimensional space (MDS) framework, the poor discriminability of other-race faces is due to their being more densely clustered in face space than own-race faces. Multidimensional scaling analyses of similarity ratings (Caucasian participants, n = 22) showed that other-race (Chinese) faces are more densely clustered in face space. We applied a formal model to test whether the spatial location of face stimuli could account for identification accuracy of another group of Caucasian participants (n = 30). As expected, own-race (Caucasian) faces were identified more accurately (higher hit rate, lower false alarms, and higher A') than other-race faces, which were more densely clustered than own-race faces. A quantitative model successfully predicted identification performance from the spatial locations of the stimuli. The results are discussed in relation to the standard MDS account of race effects and also an alternative "race-feature" hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15581126     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces.

Authors:  T A Busey; J L Tunnicliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework.

Authors:  K Lee; G Byatt; G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

3.  Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness.

Authors:  T Valentine; M Endo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

4.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

5.  Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: implications for models of face recognition.

Authors:  G Byatt; G Rhodes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Facial distinctiveness and the power of caricatures.

Authors:  G Rhodes; G Byatt; T Tremewan; A Kennedy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

9.  What's distinctive about a distinctive face?

Authors:  V Bruce; A M Burton; N Dench
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-02

10.  Overall similarity and the identification of separable-dimension stimuli: a choice model analysis.

Authors:  R Nosofsky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-11
View more
  16 in total

1.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

2.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Expert face coding: configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; William G Hayward; Christopher Winkler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

4.  Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

5.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger; Ryan W Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

7.  Deficits in other-race face recognition: no evidence for encoding-based effects.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2009-12

8.  Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

9.  Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Yi He; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Human face preference in gamma-frequency EEG activity.

Authors:  Elana Zion-Golumbic; Tal Golan; David Anaki; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.