Literature DB >> 11228908

Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework.

K Lee1, G Byatt, G Rhodes.   

Abstract

According to the multidimensional space framework, faces are represented as locations in a psychological face-space. Our aim was to test whether the locations of veridical, caricatured, and anticaricatured face stimuli in face-space, derived from multidimensional scaling analyses, could account for identification accuracy and distinctiveness ratings for these stimuli. Caricatures were identified more accurately and rated as more distinctive than veridical images, whereas anticaricatures were identified less accurately but were not significantly less distinctive than veridical images. In the face-space derived from multidimensional scaling, caricatures were further from the origin and less densely clustered than veridical images, whereas anticaricatures were closer to the origin and located in denser regions of the space. A quantitative model successfully predicted identification performance from the spatial locations of the stimuli. In general, the physically transformed faces were systematically mapped in the psychological space.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11228908     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  28 in total

1.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

2.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: implications for the representation of race in face space.

Authors:  Graham Byatt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

3.  Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  "Just another pretty face": a multidimensional scaling approach to face attractiveness and variability.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille; Kirsten I Ruys; Ginwan Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Tobias M R Houlton; Nanette Briers; Maryna Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with geometrical discrimination.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The Reverse-Caricature Effect Revisited: Familiarization With Frontal Facial Caricatures Improves Veridical Face Recognition.

Authors:  Jobany Rodríguez; Heather Bortfeld; Isaac Rudomín; Benjamín Hernández; Ricardo Gutiérrez-Osuna
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  Independent contributions of the face, body, and gait to the representation of the whole person.

Authors:  Noa Simhi; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Yi He; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Diana Omigie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.