Literature DB >> 19686008

Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

Stephen D Goldinger1, Yi He, Megan H Papesh.   

Abstract

The own-race bias (ORB) is a well-known finding wherein people are better able to recognize and discriminate own-race faces, relative to cross-race faces. In 2 experiments, participants viewed Asian and Caucasian faces, in preparation for recognition memory tests, while their eye movements and pupil diameters were continuously monitored. In Experiment 1 (with Caucasian participants), systematic differences emerged in both measures as a function of depicted race: While encoding cross-race faces, participants made fewer (and longer) fixations, they preferentially attended to different sets of features, and their pupils were more dilated, all relative to own-race faces. Also, in both measures, a pattern emerged wherein some participants reduced their apparent encoding effort to cross-race faces over trials. In Experiment 2 (with Asian participants), the authors observed the same patterns, although the ORB favored the opposite set of faces. Taken together, the results suggest that the ORB appears during initial perceptual encoding. Relative to own-race face encoding, cross-race encoding requires greater effort, which may reduce vigilance in some participants. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686008      PMCID: PMC2871406          DOI: 10.1037/a0016548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  36 in total

1.  The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.

Authors:  K Feenan; J G Snodgrass
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

2.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

3.  Eye movement strategies involved in face perception.

Authors:  G J Walker-Smith; A G Gale; J M Findlay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

5.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Tan; S Brake; K Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1989-08

6.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

7.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

8.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements.

Authors:  B C Goldwater
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

Authors:  J Beatty
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
View more
  42 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  A cross-race effect in metamemory: Predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Aaron S Benjamin; Xiping Liu
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-02

4.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger; Ryan W Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

6.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

7.  WHAT PREDICTS THE OWN-AGE BIAS IN FACE RECOGNITION MEMORY?

Authors:  Yi He; Natalie C Ebner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2011-01-27

8.  Visual scanning and recognition of Chinese, Caucasian, and racially ambiguous faces: contributions from bottom-up facial physiognomic information and top-down knowledge of racial categories.

Authors:  Qiandong Wang; Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Chao S Hu; Miao Qian; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.