Literature DB >> 8177958

What's distinctive about a distinctive face?

V Bruce1, A M Burton, N Dench.   

Abstract

In this study we examine the relationship between objective aspects of facial appearance and facial "distinctiveness". Specifically, we examine whether the extent to which a face deviates from "average" correlates with rated distinctiveness and measures of memorability. We find that, provided the faces are rated with hair concealed, reasonable correlations can be achieved between their physical deviation and their rated distinctiveness. More modest correlations are obtained between physical deviation and the extent to which faces are remembered, either correctly or falsely, after previous study. Furthermore, memory ratings obtained to "target" faces when they have been previously seen (i.e. "hits") do not show the expected negative correlation with the scores obtained to the same faces when acting as distractors (i.e. "false positives"), though each correlates with rated distinctiveness. This confirms the theory of Vokey and Read (1992) that the typicality/distinctiveness dimension can be broken down into two orthogonal components: "memorability" and "context-free familiarity".

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8177958     DOI: 10.1080/14640749408401146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  16 in total

1.  The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.

Authors:  R Cabeza; V Bruce; T Kato; M Oda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces.

Authors:  Charity Brown; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

3.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: implications for the representation of race in face space.

Authors:  Graham Byatt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

5.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.

Authors:  N P Costen; D M Parker; I Craw
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

6.  Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers?

Authors:  R Campbell; O Pascalis; M Coleman; S B Wallace; P J Benson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Yi He; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Not just the norm: exemplar-based models also predict face aftereffects.

Authors:  David A Ross; Mickael Deroche; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

Review 9.  Understanding Image Memorability.

Authors:  Nicole C Rust; Vahid Mehrpour
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.