Literature DB >> 20025384

Deficits in other-race face recognition: no evidence for encoding-based effects.

Megan H Papesh1, Stephen D Goldinger.   

Abstract

The other-race effect (ORE) in face recognition is typically observed in tasks which require long-term memory. Several studies, however, have found the effect early in face encoding (Lindsay, Jack, & Christian, 1991; Walker & Hewstone, 2006). In 6 experiments, with over 300 participants, we found no evidence that the recognition deficit associated with the ORE reflects deficits in immediate encoding. In Experiment 1, with a study-to-test retention interval of 4 min, participants were better able to recognise White faces, relative to Asian faces. Experiment 1 also validated the use of computer-generated faces in subsequent experiments. In Experiments 2 through 4, performance was virtually identical to Asian and White faces in match-to-sample, immediate recognition. In Experiment 5, decreasing target-foil similarity and disrupting the retention interval with trivia questions elicited a re-emergence of the ORE. Experiments 6A and 6B replicated this effect, and showed that memory for Asian faces was particularly susceptible to distraction; White faces were recognised equally well, regardless of trivia questions during the retention interval. The recognition deficit in the ORE apparently emerges from retention or retrieval deficits, not differences in immediate perceptual processing. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20025384      PMCID: PMC2868329          DOI: 10.1037/a0015802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  23 in total

1.  Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.

Authors:  D T Levin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-02

3.  The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.

Authors:  K Feenan; J G Snodgrass
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

4.  Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition.

Authors:  Kirsten J Hancock; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2008-02

5.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Tan; S Brake; K Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1989-08

6.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Pamela M Walker; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Markus Kiefer; Cindy M Bukach
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-08

9.  Believing is seeing: the effects of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception.

Authors:  Jennifer L Eberhardt; Nilanjana Dasgupta; Tracy L Banaszynski
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-03

10.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Memory Computational Basis for the Other-Race Effect.

Authors:  Jessica L Yaros; Diana A Salama; Derek Delisle; Myra S Larson; Blake A Miranda; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  How Well Do Computer-Generated Faces Tap Face Expertise?

Authors:  Kate Crookes; Louise Ewing; Ju-Dith Gildenhuys; Nadine Kloth; William G Hayward; Matt Oxner; Stephen Pond; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.