Literature DB >> 17048737

Expert face coding: configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces.

Gillian Rhodes1, William G Hayward, Christopher Winkler.   

Abstract

Configural and holistic coding are hallmarks of face perception. Although recent studies have shown that own-race faces are coded more holistically than other-race faces, the evidence for better configural coding of own-race faces is equivocal. We directly measured configural and component coding of own- and other-race male faces in Caucasian and Chinese participants. We manipulated individual features (components) or their spatial relations (configurations) using a novel morphing method to vary difficulty parametrically and tested sensitivity to these changes in a sequential matching task. Both configural and component coding were better for upright own-race than for upright other-race faces. Inversion impaired detection of configural changes more than it did detection of component changes, but also impaired performance more for easier discriminations, independent of type of change. These results challenge explanations of face expertise that rely solely on configural and holistic processing, and also call into question the widespread interpretation of large inversion decrements as diagnostic of configural coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048737     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Domain specificity in face perception.

Authors:  N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Tan; S Brake; K Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1989-08

6.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

7.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  An 'other-race' effect in age estimation from faces.

Authors:  H Dehon; S Brédart
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Pamela M Walker; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition.

Authors:  William G Hayward; Gillian Rhodes; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23
View more
  40 in total

1.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

2.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Jessica L Marcon; Kyle J Susa; Christian A Meissner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

5.  Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

Review 6.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

7.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Laura Germine; Christopher F Chabris; Garga Chatterjee; Mark Williams; Eric Loken; Ken Nakayama; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neural correlates of face gender discrimination learning.

Authors:  Junzhu Su; Qingleng Tan; Fang Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Race-based perceptual asymmetries underlying face processing in infancy.

Authors:  Angela Hayden; Ramesh S Bhatt; Nicole Zieber; Ashley Kangas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Xiaobai Li; Kari Chow; Jia Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.