Literature DB >> 1615169

Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness.

T Valentine1, M Endo.   

Abstract

Valentine (1991a, 1991b) described a theoretical framework for face recognition in which faces are encoded as locations in a multidimensional space. It was argued that this approach could provide a unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race on face recognition. In this paper we evaluate the ability of this theoretical framework to account for the effects of distinctiveness and race in four experiments in which white British and Japanese faces served as stimuli and both white British and Japanese students acted as subjects. In a recognition memory experiment the expected "own-race bias" was observed as a Race of Subject x Race of Face interaction. Distinctive faces were recognized more accurately than typical faces, but the effect of distinctiveness did not interact with the race of face or the race of subject. Typical faces were classified faster than distinctive faces in a task in which intact faces had to be distinguished from jumbled faces, as found in earlier work, and the effect of distinctiveness did not interact with the race of face or race of subject. In contrast, a task in which subjects classified faces according to their race did show a greater effect of distinctiveness for own-race faces. The results are discussed in relation to the two specific models within the multidimensional space framework identified by Valentine (1991a): a purely exemplar-based model and a norm-based coding model. It is argued that these results are more easily accommodated in terms of a purely exemplar-based model. Some conceptual problems in applying the norm-based coding model to the effect of race are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615169     DOI: 10.1080/14640749208401305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  56 in total

1.  Neural repetition suppression to identity is abolished by other-race faces.

Authors:  Luca Vizioli; Guillaume A Rousselet; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces.

Authors:  Charity Brown; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: implications for the representation of race in face space.

Authors:  Graham Byatt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

5.  Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces.

Authors:  David J Kelly; Paul C Quinn; Alan M Slater; Kang Lee; Alan Gibson; Michael Smith; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-11

6.  Verbal facilitation of face recognition.

Authors:  Charity Brown; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

7.  Serial position effects in short-term visual memory: a SIMPLE explanation?

Authors:  Dennis C Hay; Mary M Smyth; Graham J Hitch; Neil J Horton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

8.  Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

9.  Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

10.  The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation.

Authors:  Eve Willadsen-Jensen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.