Literature DB >> 22008980

The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Lun Zhao1, Shlomo Bentin.   

Abstract

We explored perceptual factors that might account for the other-race classification advantage (ORCA) in classifying faces by race. Testing Chinese participants in China and Israeli participants in Israel we show that: (a) The distinction between Chinese and Israeli faces is highly accurate even on the basis of isolated eyes or faces with eyes concealed, but full faces are categorized faster. (b) The ORCA is similarly robust for full faces and for face parts. (c) The ORCA was larger when the configuration of the inner-face components was distorted, reflecting delayed categorization of own-race distorted faces relative to own-race normally configured faces but no conspicuous distortion effect on other-race faces. These data demonstrate that perceptual factors can account for the ORCA independently of social bias. We suggest that one source of the ORCA in race categorization is the configural analysis applied by default while processing own-race but not other-race faces.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008980      PMCID: PMC3225710          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  43 in total

1.  Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing.

Authors:  E McKone; P Martini; K Nakayama
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  "We all look the same to me": positive emotions eliminate the own-race in face recognition.

Authors:  Kareem J Johnson; Barbara L Fredrickson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-11

3.  Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Richard Le Grand; Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Henry P Brent
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Jacqueline L Brewer; Sarah MacPherson; Gillian Rhodes; William G Hayward
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Wenger; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise.

Authors:  M Fallshore; J W Schooler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition.

Authors:  William G Hayward; Gillian Rhodes; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23
View more
  11 in total

1.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The effect of ethnicity and team membership on face processing: a cultural neuroscience perspective.

Authors:  Zhimin Yan; Stephanie N L Schmidt; Sebastian Saur; Peter Kirsch; Daniela Mier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Face-voice space: Integrating visual and auditory cues in judgments of person distinctiveness.

Authors:  Joshua R Tatz; Zehra F Peynircioğlu; William Brent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The iterative nature of person construal: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Edgar C Merkle; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Predominance of eyes and surface information for face race categorization.

Authors:  Isabelle Bülthoff; Wonmo Jung; Regine G M Armann; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The India Face Set: International and Cultural Boundaries Impact Face Impressions and Perceptions of Category Membership.

Authors:  Anjana Lakshmi; Bernd Wittenbrink; Joshua Correll; Debbie S Ma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

7.  Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.

Authors:  Hailing Wang; Enguang Chen; JingJing Li; Fanglin Ji; Yujing Lian; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Tianyi Yan; Luyang Tao; Lun Zhao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Role of Spatial Frequency Information in Face Classification by Race.

Authors:  Guoping Zhang; Zeyao Wang; Jie Wu; Lun Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-24

10.  Rapid saccadic categorization of other-race faces.

Authors:  Peter de Lissa; Nayla Sokhn; Sasha Lasrado; Kanji Tanaka; Katsumi Watanabe; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.