Literature DB >> 18567264

Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Timothy Potter1, Olivier Corneille.   

Abstract

Face attractiveness relates positively to the mathematical averageness of a face, but how close attractive faces of varying groups are to their own and to other-group prototypes in the face space remains unclear. In two studies, we modeled the locations of attractive and unattractive Caucasian, Asian, and African faces in participants' face space using multidimensional scaling analysis. In all three sets of faces, facial attractiveness significantly increased with the absolute proximity of a face to its group prototype. In the case of Caucasian and African faces (Study 1), facial attractiveness also tended to increase with the absolute proximity of a face to the other-group prototype. However, this association was at best marginal, and it became clearly nonsignificant when distance to the own-group prototype was controlled for. Thus, the present research provides original evidence that average features of faces contribute to increasing their attractiveness, but only when these features are average to the group to which a face belongs. The present research also offers further support to face space models of people's mental representations of faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567264     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

2.  Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation.

Authors:  Richard Russell; Pawan Sinha; Irving Biederman; Marissa Nederhouser
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy.

Authors:  Martin Schulte-Rüther; Hans J Markowitsch; Gereon R Fink; Martina Piefke
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  "Just another pretty face": a multidimensional scaling approach to face attractiveness and variability.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille; Kirsten I Ruys; Ginwan Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Applying the attractor field model to social cognition: Perceptual discrimination is facilitated, but memory is impaired for faces displaying evaluatively congruent expressions.

Authors:  Olivier Corneille; Kurt Hugenberg; Timothy Potter
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-09

6.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

7.  Mapping attractor fields in face space: the atypicality bias in face recognition.

Authors:  J Tanaka; M Giles; S Kremen; V Simon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-09

Review 8.  The psychosocial consequences of androgenetic alopecia: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  T F Cash
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.

Authors:  Piotr Winkielman; Jamin Halberstadt; Tedra Fazendeiro; Steve Catty
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

10.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.

Authors:  Shinsuke Shimojo; Claudiu Simion; Eiko Shimojo; Christian Scheier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

1.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

2.  SHIFTING THE PROTOTYPE: EXPERIENCE WITH FACES INFLUENCES AFFECTIVE AND ATTRACTIVENESS PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Connor P Principe; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2012-02

3.  The neural correlates of the face attractiveness aftereffect: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Catherine J Mondloch; Xiao Pan Ding; Lindsey A Short; Liping Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Selectivity of face aftereffects for expressions and anti-expressions.

Authors:  Igor Juricevic; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-24

5.  Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.

Authors:  Christoph Bartneck; Andreas Duenser; Elena Moltchanova; Karolina Zawieska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.

Authors:  Stella J Faerber; Jürgen M Kaufmann; Helmut Leder; Eva Maria Martin; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants.

Authors:  Fabrice Damon; David Méary; Paul C Quinn; Kang Lee; Elizabeth A Simpson; Annika Paukner; Stephen J Suomi; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Facial shape affects self-perceived facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Georgios Kanavakis; Demetrios Halazonetis; Christos Katsaros; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The deviation-from-familiarity effect: Expertise increases uncanniness of deviating exemplars.

Authors:  Alexander Diel; Michael Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Joerg Luedicke; Manuel C Voelkle; Michaela Riediger; Tian Lin; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.