Literature DB >> 12897977

Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

J Damilakis1, G Papadokostakis, K Perisinakis, A Hadjipavlou, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of forearm bone mineral density (BMD) and speed of sound (SOS) at the phalanx and radius as pre-selection tests to identify women with low BMD at the axial skeleton. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the forearm, lumbar spine and femoral neck. SOS at the radius and phalanx was measured using a multisite quantitative ultrasound (QUS) device. Measurements were performed on 524 consecutive women referred for the assessment of BMD. Women with a T-score <-1 and T-score < or =-2.5 at either spine or femoral neck were identified, and T-score cut-off values for the forearm DXA and QUS variables were determined. Cut-off values for the forearm BMD estimated to detect normal women and those with T-score <-1 at the axial skeleton identified a total of 82% of subjects with 91% certainty. Cut-off values for the forearm BMD determined to detect women with T-score >-2.5 and those with osteoporosis allowed the identification of 62% of the study population with 90% certainty. Cut-off values for the phalangeal and radial SOS estimated to detect normal women and those with T-score <-1 at the axial skeleton identified a total of 49% and 1% of subjects, respectively. Cut-off values estimated for QUS variables to detect women with T-score >-2.5 and those with osteoporosis at the axial skeleton either failed to detect subjects with sufficient certainty (phalangeal SOS) or detected a negligible percentage of patients (radial SOS). In conclusion, forearm BMD may be used as a pre-selection test to identify women with low BMD at the axial skeleton, thus enabling reduction of the number of women who need axial BMD assessment. SOS of the phalanges and radius appears to have less value in the detection of the women with low axial BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897977     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1420-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Age-specific values and cutoff levels for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in quantitative ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus with SAHARA in healthy Japanese women: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; M Iki; A Morita; H Aihara; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; T Matsuzaki; H Yoneshima; F Marumo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Effect of lifetime occupational physical activity on indices of bone mineral status in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J Damilakis; K Perisinakis; G Kontakis; E Vagios; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art.

Authors:  H K Genant; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C C Glüer; S Grampp; S T Harris; M Jergas; T Lang; Y Lu; S Majumdar; A Mathur; M Takada
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals.

Authors:  S Grampp; C Henk; Y Lu; C Krestan; H Resch; F Kainberger; S Youssefzadeh; F Vorbeck; H Imhof
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?

Authors:  H L Jørgensen; L Warming; N H Bjarnason; P B Andersen; C Hassager
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  2001-01

6.  Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?

Authors:  D Hans; S K Srivastav; C Singal; R Barkmann; C F Njeh; E Kantorovich; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?

Authors:  E M B Pacheco; E J Harrison; K A Ward; M Lunt; J E Adams
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review.

Authors:  P Augat; T Fuerst; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Osteoporosis: association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; D C Bauer; K Stone; A Pressman; A Mathur; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility.

Authors:  A Pfeil; J Böttcher; H J Mentzel; G Lehmann; M L Schäfer; A Kramer; A Petrovitch; B E Seidl; A Malich; G Hein; G Wolf; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Solomou; G E Manios; A Karantanas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Utility and validation of bone mineral density measurements at forearm in predicting trabecular microarchitecture and central-site osteoporosis in aging Indian postmenopausal women-a promising surrogate?

Authors:  Krishna Prabha Gautam; Kripa Elizabeth Cherian; Nitin Kapoor; Nihal Thomas; Thomas Vizhalil Paul
Journal:  Aging Med (Milton)       Date:  2022-01-23

6.  The ability of calcaneal and multisite quantitative ultrasound variables in the identification of osteoporosis in women and men.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Sina Esmaeilzadeh; Ayşe Yalıman; Dilşad Sindel; Pınar Kürsüz Köseoğlu; Tuğba Aydın
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.