Literature DB >> 11168297

How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?

H L Jørgensen1, L Warming, N H Bjarnason, P B Andersen, C Hassager.   

Abstract

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has proposed a set of guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in adult women based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) expressed as the number of SD below young adult mean (t-score). In this study, we investigated the number of subjects classified as either osteopenic or osteoporotic according to these guidelines using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), at the hip, at the spine and at the lower forearm and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), at the heel. A total of 247 men, 209 postmenopausal women and 195 premenopausal women were included in the study. Furthermore, the study provides the first normative data showing the influence of sex, age and menopause on broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS), as measured by the DTU-one imaging ultrasound scanner. The difference between the number of patients classified into either diagnosis group by the investigated parameters is large ranging from 25.9% of the women being diagnosed as osteopenic by BUA at the heel to 43.0% by BMD at the femoral neck. For men, the same range is from 20.5% by BUA to 44.1% by BMD at the femoral neck. For the classification into the osteoporotic group, the range is from 2.5% by intertrochanteric BMD to 24.4% by BMD at Ward's triangle for women and from 0% by SOS to 29.0% by BMD at Ward's triangle for men. Using total hip BMD as the reference parameter to categorize the subjects as normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic, the agreement of the other parameters with this classification is assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. We conclude that there are significant differences in the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia depending on the site measured and the technique used for the bone mass assessment. Furthermore, we suggest that development of technique and site specific cut-off values may increase the accuracy of the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia in both men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11168297     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00298.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol        ISSN: 0144-5979


  10 in total

1.  Soy milk and dairy consumption is independently associated with ultrasound attenuation of the heel bone among postmenopausal women: the Adventist Health Study-2.

Authors:  Vichuda Lousuebsakul Matthews; Synnove F Knutsen; W Lawrence Beeson; Gary E Fraser
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Evaluation of bone density in infancy and adolescence. Review of medical literature and personal experience.

Authors:  Luisella Pedrotti; Barbara Bertani; Gabriella Tuvo; Francesca Barone; Ilaria Crivellari; Stefano Lucanto; Mora Redento
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

3.  Impact of Walking and Running on the Heel bone: the Adventist Health Study-2.

Authors:  Vichuda Lousuebsakul-Matthews; Donna Thorpe; Raymond Knutsen; W Larry Beeson; Gary E Fraser; Synnove F Knutsen
Journal:  J Sci Res Rep       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The influence of corticosteroids on quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in the 1st year after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Cornelis G ter Meulen; Luuk B Hilbrands; Joop P W van den Bergh; Ad R Hermus; Andries J Hoitsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men.

Authors:  J Rawal; K Eleftheriou; J Skipworth; Z Puthucheary; M Loosemore; J Payne; F Dreno; M World; F Haddad; S Humphries; H Montgomery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound is better correlated with bone mineral density and biochemical bone markers in elderly women.

Authors:  Vasiliki Lappa; Ismene A Dontas; George Trovas; Evangelia Constantelou; Antonios Galanos; George P Lyritis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Correlation between Parameters of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Hip Structural Analysis in Osteoporotic Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Licheng Zhang; Houchen Lv; Hailiang Zheng; Ming Li; Pengbin Yin; Ye Peng; Yuan Gao; Lihai Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of the "Building Osteo Neatly Exercise" program on quantitative ultrasound parameters and plantar pressure distribution for college-aged females.

Authors:  Shiho Kurosaka; Takeshi Ueda; Yuko Yamasaki; Ayumi Tanigashira; Tatsuya Deguchi; Ken Okihara; Yoshio Yuzaki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-09-05

10.  Screening for low bone mass with quantitative ultrasonography in a community without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: population-based survey.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Ian Jen; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Shui-Hu Chen; Pesus Chou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.