J Damilakis1, G Solomou, G E Manios, A Karantanas. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. damilaki@med.uoc.gr
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible. INTRODUCTION: No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner. METHODS: Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study. RESULTS: The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02-0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices.
UNLABELLED: Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible. INTRODUCTION: No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner. METHODS: Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study. RESULTS: The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02-0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices.
Authors: Sundeep Khosla; L Joseph Melton; Mark B Dekutoski; Sara J Achenbach; Ann L Oberg; B Lawrence Riggs Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Lígia Araújo Martini; Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Carla M Prado; Camila Lemos Pinto; Iana Mizumukai de Araújo; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Joao Lindolfo Cunha Borges; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Marcela Ushida; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro Journal: Adv Rheumatol Date: 2022-03-20
Authors: Dimitris Vlachopoulos; Alan R Barker; Craig A Williams; Karen M Knapp; Brad S Metcalf; Luis Gracia-Marco Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 3.295