Literature DB >> 11477243

Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals.

S Grampp1, C Henk, Y Lu, C Krestan, H Resch, F Kainberger, S Youssefzadeh, F Vorbeck, H Imhof.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To calculate cutoff levels for quantitative ultrasonography (US) performed to distinguish healthy individuals and those with osteoporosis identified with dual x-ray absorptiometry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1,357 patients (856 females, aged 55.1 years +/- 15.4 [mean +/- SD]; 501 males, aged 50.4 years +/- 15), bone mineral density measurements of the lumbar spine (posteroanterior, L1 through L4) and femoral neck were obtained, and quantitative US was performed to determine the stiffness of the calcaneus. Individuals with a T score less than -2.5 (osteoporotic) at the spine and femur were identified, and upper T-score cutoff values (3 SDs from the mean) in the groups of male and female patients with osteoporosis were identified.
RESULTS: Females with dual x-ray absorptiometric values that were indicative of osteoporosis of the spine had an upper T-score cutoff value of -1.0 (males, -0.2). Females who had femoral osteoporosis showed an upper quantitative US T-score cutoff value of -0.6 (males, 0).
CONCLUSION: Cutoff values may permit the use of quantitative US to screen for the presence of osteoporosis in the spine and femur. Quantitative US will help to prevent unnecessary dual x-ray absorptiometric and conventional radiographic examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11477243     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.2.r01au05400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound of the hand phalanges in a cohort of monozygotic twins: influence of genetic and environmental factors.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; F de Terlizzi; I Torrente; R Mingarelli; B Dallapiccola
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Is bone tissue really affected by swimming? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alejandro Gómez-Bruton; Alejandro Gónzalez-Agüero; Alba Gómez-Cabello; José A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanges in a cohort of monozygotic twins of different ages.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesca De Terlizzi; Michelangelo Nasuto; Lorenzo Sinibaldi; Francesco Brancati
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Association of physical exercise and calcium intake with bone mass measured by quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Yannis Dionyssiotis; Ioanna Paspati; Georgios Trovas; Antonios Galanos; Georgios P Lyritis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry alone or in combination in a triage approach for assessment of osteoporosis: a study of older women with a high prevalence of falls.

Authors:  Katja Thomsen; Jesper Ryg; Anne P Hermann; Lars Matzen; Tahir Masud
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.