Literature DB >> 17131124

An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

John Damilakis1, Thomas G Maris, Apostolos H Karantanas.   

Abstract

In this article, the currently available radiologic techniques for assessing osteoporosis are reviewed. Density measurements of the skeleton using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are clinically indicated for the assessment of osteoporosis and for the evaluation of therapies. DXA is the most widely used technique for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is the only method, which provides a volumetric density. Unlike DXA, QCT allows for selective trabecular measurement and is less sensitive to degenerative diseases of the spine. The analysis of bone structure in conjunction with bone density is an exciting new field in the assessment of osteoporosis. High-resolution multi-slice CT and micro-CT are useful tools for the assessment of bone microarchitecture. A growing literature indicates that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques are capable of assessing fracture risk. Although the ease of use and the absence of ionizing radiation make QUS attractive, the specific role of QUS techniques in clinical practice needs further determination. Considerable progress has been made in the development of MR techniques for assessing osteoporosis during the last few years. In addition to relaxometry techniques, high-resolution MR imaging, diffusion MR imaging and in-vivo MR spectroscopy may be used to quantify trabecular bone architecture and mineral composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17131124     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0511-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  67 in total

1.  Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Recommendations for thresholds for cortical bone geometry and density measurement by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  K A Ward; J E Adams; T N Hangartner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Anne C Looker; John A Shepherd; Michael K O'Connor; Sara J Achenbach; B Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness.

Authors:  D Schellinger; C S Lin; H G Hatipoglu; D Fertikh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Elyazid Mouhsine; Nicolas Theumann; Philippe Mordasini; Guy van Melle; Pierre F Leyvraz; Pierre Schnyder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral measurement: technical aspects, dosimetry, normal data and clinical applications.

Authors:  A H Karantanas; J A Kalef-Ezra; D C Glaros
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis. Current methods and perspectives.

Authors:  S Grampp; M Jergas; C C Glüer; P Lang; P Brastow; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  22 in total

1.  MR spectroscopy and micro-CT in evaluation of osteoporosis model in rabbits: comparison with histopathology.

Authors:  Guan-wu Li; Guang-yu Tang; Yong Liu; Rong-biao Tang; Yi-feng Peng; Wei Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  How to determine the bone mineral density of the distal humerus with radiographic tools?

Authors:  Philippe Clavert; R-M Javier; J L Charrissoux; L Obert; L Pidhorz; F Sirveaux; P Mansat; T Fabre
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Reproducibility of trabecular structure analysis using flat-panel volume computed tomography.

Authors:  Arnold C Cheung; Miriam A Bredella; Ma'moun Al Khalaf; Michael Grasruck; Christianne Leidecker; Rajiv Gupta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The peregrine falcon's rapid dive: on the adaptedness of the arm skeleton and shoulder girdle.

Authors:  Anke Schmitz; Nele Ondreka; Julia Poleschinski; Dominik Fischer; Helmut Schmitz; Adrian Klein; Horst Bleckmann; Christoph Bruecker
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Bone mineral density of the coracoid process decreases with age.

Authors:  Jean Sébastien Beranger; Ali Maqdes; Nicolas Pujol; Pierre Desmoineaux; Philippe Beaufils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 7.  Fractal lacunarity of trabecular bone and magnetic resonance imaging: New perspectives for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment.

Authors:  Annamaria Zaia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

8.  Detection of incidental vertebral fractures on routine lateral chest radiographs.

Authors:  V Cataldi; T Laporta; N Sverzellati; M De Filippo; M Zompatori
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur--prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA.

Authors:  T Baum; J Carballido-Gamio; M B Huber; D Müller; R Monetti; C Räth; F Eckstein; E M Lochmüller; S Majumdar; E J Rummeny; T M Link; J S Bauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Efficacy of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Evaluation of Biomechanical Properties: Bone Mineral Density and Actual Bone Strength.

Authors:  Sung Hwa Seo; Joomi Lee; Il Hyung Park
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.