Literature DB >> 11960208

Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?

E M B Pacheco1, E J Harrison, K A Ward, M Lunt, J E Adams.   

Abstract

The study assessed the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of a recently developed peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner, applied to the calcaneus, in the identification of individuals with osteoporosis at axial sites by DXA. Two hundred and two women, aged 55.2 +/- l3.7 years (mean +/- SD), participated in the study. The precisions (coefficient of variation) of measurements in vitro (0.48%) and in vivo (1.40%) were very good. The in vivo precision was independent of the operator, foot size, foot width, weight, height, and body mass index. Calcaneus BMD correlated moderately (r = 0.494-0.690, P <0.001) with axial BMD measurements by DXA. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) criterion for defining osteoporosis (T score ? -2.5) the specificity of the calcaneus to identify patients with osteoporosis at total hip, femoral neck, spine, or any of these axial sites was excellent (97.0%, 97.0%, 96.5%, and 97.1%, respectively); however, the sensitivity was poor (58.8%, 36.4%, 21.8%, and 20.3%, respectively). Therefore, the WHO criterion is not appropriate for DXA calcaneus. Based on femoral neck BMD for detection of osteoporosis, a more appropriate calcaneus T score threshold would be -1.4 by analyses of receiver-operator characteristic curves; this might serve to select those patients who might appropriately be referred for axial DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11960208     DOI: 10.1007/s002230020030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  Reproducibility and sources of variability in radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images.

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Ann Pham; Joel Wilkie; Masha Kocherginsky; Siu-Ling Ma; Michael Chinander; Theodore Karrison; Octavia Bris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 2.  The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee and heel: methodology and implications for research to reduce bone mineral loss after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W T Peppler; W J Kim; K Ethans; K C Cowley
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Early diagnosis of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesca di Chio; Maria Rita Delle Vergini; Michele La Porta; Michelangelo Nasuto; Luigia Anna Di Primio
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-01

6.  Changes in bone mineral density in unconscious immobile stroke patients from the acute to chronic phases of brain diseases.

Authors:  Shoko Merrit Yamada
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2022-09-21

7.  A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  K A Ward; J Cotton; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Arsenic, cadmium, and selenium exposures and bone mineral density-related endpoints: The HORTEGA study.

Authors:  Marta Galvez-Fernandez; Maria Grau-Perez; Tamara Garcia-Barrera; Sara Ramirez-Acosta; Jose L Gomez-Ariza; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Iñaki Galan-Labaca; Ana Navas-Acien; Josep Redon; Laisa S Briongos-Figuero; Antonio Dueñas-Laita; Jose Luis Perez-Castrillon; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Juan Carlos Martin-Escudero
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 8.101

10.  Calcaneal Ultrasound and Its Relation to Dietary and Lifestyle Factors, Anthropometry, and Vitamin D Deficiency in Young Medical Students.

Authors:  Lena Jafri; Hafsa Majid; Sibtain Ahmed; Ghazala Naureen; Aysha Habib Khan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.