Literature DB >> 10024899

Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review.

P Augat1, T Fuerst, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density and geometric properties of the human forearm can be measured to determine the amount of bone or bone loss at the scanning site and to predict the risk of forearm fractures. These forearm measurements are also used to estimate bone mass at remote anatomical locations and thereby estimate the risk for spine, hip and other fractures. The peripheral location of the human forearm, with its relatively small amount of surrounding soft tissue, improves the accuracy and the precision of bone mass measurement and has made this site an early choice for the assessment of a subject's bone mineral status. Furthermore, the anatomy of the human radius enables the examination of both cortical and cancellous bone. This review describes the procedures for non-invasive bone assessment at peripheral sites including some of the more recently developed systems dedicated to assessment of the distal radius. The accuracy, precision and normative values they provide are presented. Responses to different forms of therapies as well as the ability to discriminate or predict osteoporotic fractures are also assessed. Low radiation dose, comfortable and fast handling, moderate cost, and a strong association with the risk of non-spine fractures, promote the use of forearm scanning as a widely applied screening procedure for the detection of generalised osteoporotic bone loss. However, a higher accuracy of fracture risk prediction at the spine or at the hip can be achieved by a direct bone density measurement at these sites. The monitoring of treatment at the distal forearm appears to require a longer follow-up time due to its decreased responsiveness compared with such highly trabecular load-bearing sites as the spine and the proximal femur.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10024899     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?

Authors:  Masako Ito; Akifumi Nishida; Jun Kono; Mika Kono; Masataka Uetani; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Reproducibility of peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements at the radius and tibia in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kristina A Szabo; Colin E Webber; Christopher Gordon; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Tozer; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø study, a population-based study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; G K R Berntsen; R Joakimsen; V Fønnebø
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The impact of accurate positioning on measurements made by peripheral QCT in the distal radius.

Authors:  E J Marjanovic; K A Ward; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  J A Clowes; N F A Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Follicle-stimulating hormone and bioavailable estradiol are less important than weight and race in determining bone density in younger postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M L Gourlay; J S Preisser; C A Hammett-Stabler; J B Renner; J Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women--the HUNT Study, Norway.

Authors:  Siri Forsmo; Arnulf Langhammer; Lisa Forsen; Berit Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.