Literature DB >> 16736163

Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility.

A Pfeil1, J Böttcher, H J Mentzel, G Lehmann, M L Schäfer, A Kramer, A Petrovitch, B E Seidl, A Malich, G Hein, G Wolf, W A Kaiser.   

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate multi-site quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) considering the effects of body mass index (BMI) and disease activity on measurements in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sixty-eight patients underwent a cross-sectional analysis of bone mineral density measured by DXA (lumbar spine, total femur) and speed of sound estimated by QUS (phalanx III, distal radius). The short-term precision of QUS was investigated with regard to BMI of healthy individuals and with regard to the level of disease activity in patients suffering from RA. The patients with RA were divided into two BMI groups as well as into low and advanced disease activity groups. The short-term precision of QUS-SOS ranged from 0.90 to 2.55% (healthy controls) and from 0.64 to 1.89% (patients with RA). The association between DXA and QUS parameters were limited in the case of advanced disease activity and pronounced BMI. Low QUS-SOS was observed for advanced disease activity group (QUS-SOS phalanx: -2.5%; QUS-SOS distal radius: -2.1%) in comparison to low disease activity group, whereas only a slight change of DXA parameters was observed. DXA-BMD and QUS parameters revealed higher values with pronounced BMI. The system shows only a short-term precision with limitations in healthy controls with accentuated BMI, as well as in patients with active RA. The application of multi-site QUS seems to be restricted for patients with active inflammation based on soft tissue alteration in RA and for healthy individuals with pronounced body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736163     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-006-0140-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  30 in total

1.  Peripheral bone status in rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by digital X-ray radiogrammetry and compared with multisite quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Pfeil; H Mentzel; A Kramer; M-L Schäfer; G Lehmann; T Eidner; A Petrovitch; A Malich; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Clinical associations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Devlin; J Lilley; A Gough; A Huissoon; R Holder; R Reece; P Perkins; P Emery
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-12

3.  Radiographic damage associated with low bone mineral density and vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis: the Oslo-Truro-Amsterdam (OSTRA) collaborative study.

Authors:  Mariette C Lodder; Glenn Haugeberg; Willem F Lems; Till Uhlig; Ragnhild E Orstavik; Piet J Kostense; Ben A C Dijkmans; Tore K Kvien; Anthony D Woolf
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-04-15

4.  A simplified twenty-eight-joint quantitative articular index in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H A Fuchs; R H Brooks; L F Callahan; T Pincus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1989-05

Review 5.  Measurement of bone mass and turnover.

Authors:  N Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1993-10

6.  Evaluation of finger ultrasound in the assessment of bone status with application of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; A Gough; D Hans; S K Srivastav; N Bulmer; J Devlin; P Emery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?

Authors:  D Hans; S K Srivastav; C Singal; R Barkmann; C F Njeh; E Kantorovich; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Dequeker; K Maenaut; J Verwilghen; R Westhovens
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 9.  An approach to complex rheumatoid hand and wrist problems.

Authors:  W F Blair
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.907

10.  Predictors of bone mineral density and osteoporosis in patients attending a rheumatology outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Young Ho Lee; Young Hee Rho; Seong Jae Choi; Jong Dae Ji; Gwan Gyu Song
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 2.631

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of sex, age, body mass index and handedness on finger joint space width in patients with prolonged rheumatoid arthritis using computer-aided joint space analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Andreas Hansch; Gabriele Lehmann; Thorsten Eidner; Max L Schäfer; Peter Oelzner; Diane M Renz; Gunter Wolf; Gert Hein; Werner A Kaiser; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  A comparison of peripheral imaging technologies for bone and muscle quantification: a technical review of image acquisition.

Authors:  A K Wong
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.041

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.