Literature DB >> 28863614

Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Carolina Abdala1, Radha Kalluri1.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide salient information about cochlear function and dysfunction. Two broad classes of emissions, linear reflection and nonlinear distortion, arise via distinct cochlear processes and hence, appear to provide independent information about cochlear health and hearing. Considered in combination, these two OAE types may characterize sensory hearing loss most effectively. In this study, the level-dependent growth of stimulus-frequency OAEs (a reflection-type emission) and distortion-product OAEs (a distortion-type emission) were measured in ten normal-hearing ears and eight ears with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Metrics of OAE strength and compression were derived from OAE input/output functions and then considered in a combined fashion. Results indicate that SFOAEs and DPOAEs differ significantly in their strength and compression features. When SFOAE and DPOAE metrics are displayed together on a two-dimensional plot, relatively well-defined data clusters describe their normative relationship. In hearing-impaired ears, this relationship is disrupted but not in a uniform way across ears; ears with similar audiograms showed differently altered joint-OAE profiles. Hearing loss sometimes affected only one OAE or one more than the other. Results suggest a joint-OAE profile is promising and warrants study in a large group of subjects with sensory hearing loss of varied etiologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28863614      PMCID: PMC5552396          DOI: 10.1121/1.4996859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program.

Authors:  Judi A Lapsley Miller; Lynne Marshall; Laurie M Heller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Srikanta Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Evoked oto-acoustic emissions from adults and infants: clinical applications.

Authors:  P Bonfils; A Uziel; R Pujol
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption.

Authors:  G R Long; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal; Anup Amatya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Emily C Bosen; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02

7.  Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Yeini C Guardia
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Yeini Guardia
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

10.  Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zhihang Qi; Mengmeng Yu; Jinhai Wang; Ruijuan Chen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-09-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.