Literature DB >> 14716508

Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Renato Nobili1, Ales Vetesnik, Lorenzo Turicchia, Fabio Mammano.   

Abstract

Sounds originating from within the inner ear, known as otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), are widely exploited in clinical practice but the mechanisms underlying their generation are not entirely clear. Here we present simulation results and theoretical considerations based on a hydrodynamic model of the human inner ear. Simulations show that, if the cochlear amplifier (CA) gain is a smooth function of position within the active cochlea, filtering performed by a middle ear with an irregular, i.e., nonsmooth, forward transfer function suffices to produce irregular and long-lasting residual oscillations of cochlear basilar membrane (BM) at selected frequencies. Feeding back to the middle ear through hydrodynamic coupling afforded by the cochlear fluid, these oscillations are detected as transient evoked OAEs in the ear canal. If, in addition, the CA gain profile is affected by irregularities, residual BM oscillations are even more irregular and tend to evolve towards self-sustaining oscillations at the loci of gain irregularities. Correspondingly, the spectrum of transient evoked OAEs exhibits sharp peaks. If both the CA gain and the middle-ear forward transfer function are smooth, residual BM oscillations have regular waveforms and extinguish rapidly. In this case no emissions are produced. Finally, and paradoxically albeit consistent with observations, simulating localized damage to the CA results in self-sustaining BM oscillations at the characteristic frequencies (CFs) of the sites adjacent to the damage region, accompanied by generation of spontaneous OAEs. Under these conditions, stimulus-frequency OAEs, with typical modulation patterns, are also observed for inputs near hearing threshold. This approach can be exploited to provide novel diagnostic tools and a better understanding of key phenomena relevant for hearing science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14716508      PMCID: PMC3202748          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-002-3055-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  44 in total

1.  Direct measurement of intra-cochlear pressure waves.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evidence for active, nonlinear, negative feedback in the vibration response of the apical region of the in-vivo guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  C Zinn; H Maier; H Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Three-dimensional motion of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  W Hemmert; H P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Can you still see the cochlea for the molecules?

Authors:  J F Ashmore; F Mammano
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. IV. Tone and noise stimuli.

Authors:  Boer Egbert de; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  J Zheng; W Shen; D Z He; K B Long; L D Madison; P Dallos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  "Otoacoustic" emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback.

Authors:  E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  R Aibara; J T Welsh; S Puria; R L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Do forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured as vibration on the eardrum of human subjects.

Authors:  E Dalhoff; D Turcanu; H-P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  New perspectives in brain information processing.

Authors:  Renato Nobili
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Distortion product emissions from a cochlear model with nonlinear mechanoelectrical transduction in outer hair cells.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  The cochlear amplifier: augmentation of the traveling wave within the inner ear.

Authors:  John S Oghalai
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Marcus T Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  A resonance approach to cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrew Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Musical ratios in sounds from the human cochlea.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Blinowska; Konrad Kwaskiewicz; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mouse Panx1 Is Dispensable for Hearing Acquisition and Auditory Function.

Authors:  Veronica Zorzi; Fabiola Paciello; Gaia Ziraldo; Chiara Peres; Flavia Mazzarda; Chiara Nardin; Miriam Pasquini; Francesco Chiani; Marcello Raspa; Ferdinando Scavizzi; Andrea Carrer; Giulia Crispino; Catalin D Ciubotaru; Hannah Monyer; Anna R Fetoni; Anna M Salvatore; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Waves on Reissner's membrane: a mechanism for the propagation of otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea.

Authors:  Tobias Reichenbach; Aleksandra Stefanovic; Fumiaki Nin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.