Literature DB >> 22280598

Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Magdalena Wojtczak1, Jordan A Beim, Christophe Micheyl, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Cochlear filtering results in earlier responses to high than to low frequencies. This study examined potential perceptual correlates of cochlear delays by measuring the perception of relative timing between tones of different frequencies. A brief 250-Hz tone was combined with a brief 1-, 2-, 4-, or 6-kHz tone. Two experiments were performed, one involving subjective judgments of perceived synchrony, the other involving asynchrony detection and discrimination. The functions relating the proportion of "synchronous" responses to the delay between the tones were similar for all tone pairs. Perceived synchrony was maximal when the tones in a pair were gated synchronously. The perceived-synchrony function slopes were asymmetric, being steeper on the low-frequency-leading side. In the second experiment, asynchrony-detection thresholds were lower for low-frequency rather than for high-frequency leading pairs. In contrast with previous studies, but consistent with the first experiment, thresholds did not depend on frequency separation between the tones, perhaps because of the elimination of within-channel cues. The results of the two experiments were related quantitatively using a decision-theoretic model, and were found to be highly correlated. Overall the results suggest that frequency-dependent cochlear group delays are compensated for at higher processing stages, resulting in veridical perception of timing relationships across frequency.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22280598      PMCID: PMC3272712          DOI: 10.1121/1.3665995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  61 in total

1.  DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears.

Authors:  R Schoonhoven; V F Prijs; S Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceived order in different sense modalities.

Authors:  I J HIRSH; C E SHERRICK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-11

5.  Initial discharge latency and threshold considerations for some neurons in cochlear nuclear complex of the cat.

Authors:  L M Kitzes; M M Gibson; J E Rose; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stimulus-based limitations on the discrimination between different temporal orders of tones.

Authors:  W J Kelly; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Timing of cochlear responses inferred from frequency-threshold tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rhythm judgments reveal a frequency asymmetry in the perception and neural coding of sound synchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Coral Hanson; Laurent Demany; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24

5.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

6.  The origins of music in auditory scene analysis and the roles of evolution and culture in musical creation.

Authors:  Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.