Literature DB >> 25364292

Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

The nature of pitch and its neural coding have been studied for over a century. A popular debate has revolved around the question of whether pitch is coded via "place" cues in the cochlea, or via timing cues in the auditory nerve. In the most recent incarnation of this debate, the role of temporal fine structure has been emphasized in conveying important pitch and speech information, particularly because the lack of temporal fine structure coding in cochlear implants might explain some of the difficulties faced by cochlear implant users in perceiving music and pitch contours in speech. In addition, some studies have postulated that hearing-impaired listeners may have a specific deficit related to processing temporal fine structure. This article reviews some of the recent literature surrounding the debate, and argues that much of the recent evidence suggesting the importance of temporal fine structure processing can also be accounted for using spectral (place) or temporal-envelope cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory perception; Hearing; Pitch; Temporal fine structure

Year:  2013        PMID: 25364292      PMCID: PMC4215732          DOI: 10.1250/ast.34.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol        ISSN: 1346-3969


  67 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms for the abstraction and use of pitch information in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang; Kerry M M Walker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.

Authors:  Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensitivity of the human auditory system to temporal fine structure at high frequencies.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Aleksander Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The burst gap is a peripheral temporal code for pitch perception that is shared across audition and touch.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Kevin K W Ng; Ingvars Birznieks; Richard M Vickery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Sarah N Obarowski; Meredith L Anderson; Marcia C Adunka
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-10-18

4.  A New Approach to Model Pitch Perception Using Sparse Coding.

Authors:  Oded Barzelay; Miriam Furst; Omri Barak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Modeling Pitch Perception With an Active Auditory Model Extended by Octopus Cells.

Authors:  Tamas Harczos; Frank Markus Klefenz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Place and Temporal Cues in Cochlear Implant Pitch and Melody Perception.

Authors:  Brett A Swanson; Vijay M R Marimuthu; Robert H Mannell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Neural modelling of the encoding of fast frequency modulation.

Authors:  Alejandro Tabas; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Neural Measures of Pitch Processing in EEG Responses to Running Speech.

Authors:  Florine L Bachmann; Ewen N MacDonald; Jens Hjortkjær
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bigand; Charles Delbé; Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat; Marc Leman; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-06

10.  A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Attentive Music Listening on Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Perception, Quality of Life, and Behavioral and Objective Measures of Frequency Change Detection.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Firestone; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; Nanhua Zhang; Chelsea M Blankenship; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.