Literature DB >> 11508961

Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

L Litvak1, B Delgutte, D Eddington.   

Abstract

Many modern cochlear implants use sound processing strategies that stimulate the cochlea with modulated pulse trains. Rubinstein et al. [Hear. Res. 127, 108 (1999)] suggested that representation of the modulator in auditory nerve responses might be improved by the addition of a sustained, high-rate, desynchronizing pulse train (DPT). In addition, activity in response to the DPT may mimic the spontaneous activity (SA) in a healthy ear. The goals of this study were to compare responses of auditory nerve fibers in acutely deafened, anesthetized cats elicited by high-rate electric pulse trains delivered through an intracochlear electrode with SA, and to measure responses of these fibers to amplitude-modulated pulse trains superimposed upon a DPT. Responses to pulse trains showed variability from presentation to presentation, but differed from SA in the shape of the envelope of the interval histogram (IH) for pulse rates above 4.8 kpps (kilo pulses per second). These IHs had a prominent mode near 5 ms that was followed by a long tail. Responses to modulated biphasic pulse trains resembled responses to tones in intact ears for small (<10%) modulation depths, suggesting that acousticlike responses to sinusoidal stimuli might be obtained with a DPT. However, realistic responses were only observed over a narrow range of levels and modulation depths. Improved coding of complex stimulus waveforms may be achieved by signal processing strategies for cochlear implants that properly incorporate a DPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508961      PMCID: PMC2275322          DOI: 10.1121/1.1375140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  THE ACTION POTENTIAL IN THE MYELINATED NERVE FIBER OF XENOPUS LAEVIS AS COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF VOLTAGE CLAMP DATA.

Authors:  B FRANKENHAEUSER; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fractal noise strength in auditory-nerve fiber recordings.

Authors:  O E Kelly; D H Johnson; B Delgutte; P Cariani
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Ion channel stochasticity may be critical in determining the reliability and precision of spike timing.

Authors:  E Schneidman; B Freedman; I Segev
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Point process models of single-neuron discharges.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J E Rose; J F Brugge; D J Anderson; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; M Zerbi
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

10.  Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid.

Authors:  S A Xu; R K Shepherd; Y Chen; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  48 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory sensitivity may require dynamically unstable spike generators: evidence from a model of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; H Steven Colburn; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.