Literature DB >> 21110542

Auditory sensitivity may require dynamically unstable spike generators: evidence from a model of electrical stimulation.

David E O'Gorman1, H Steven Colburn, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

The response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation is highly sensitive to small modulations (<0.5%). This report demonstrates that dynamical instability (i.e., a positive Lyapunov exponent) can account for this sensitivity in a modified FitzHugh-Nagumo model of spike generation, so long as the input noise is not too large. This finding suggests both that spike generator instability is necessary to account for auditory nerve sensitivity and that the amplitude of physiological noise, such as that produced by the random behavior of voltage-gated sodium channels, is small. Based on these results with direct electrical stimulation, it is hypothesized that spike generator instability may be the mechanism that reconciles high sensitivity with the cross-fiber independence observed under acoustic stimulation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110542      PMCID: PMC2997813          DOI: 10.1121/1.3469765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Curious oddments of auditory-nerve studies.

Authors:  N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Will there be noise in their ears?

Authors:  F Moss; F Chiou-Tan; R Klinke
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  I J Russell; P M Sellick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  D H Johnson; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.