Literature DB >> 9213127

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.

R K Shepherd1, E Javel.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate evoked potential and single fibre responses to biphasic current pulses in animals with varying degrees of cochlear pathology, and to correlate any differences in the physiological response with status of the auditory nerve. Six cats, whose cochleae ranged from normal to a severe neural loss (< 5% spiral ganglion survival), were used. Morphology of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) was similar across all animals, although electrophonic responses were only observed from the normal animal. In animals with extensive neural pathology, EABR thresholds were elevated and response amplitudes throughout the dynamic range were moderately reduced. Analysis of single VIIIth nerve fibre responses were based on 207 neurons. Spontaneous discharge rates among fibres depended on hearing status, with the majority of fibres recorded from deafened animals exhibiting little or no spontaneous activity. Electrical stimulation produced a monotonic increase in discharge rate, and a systematic reduction in response latency and temporal jitter as a function of stimulus intensity for all fibres examined. Short-duration current pulses elicited a highly synchronous response (latency < 0.7 ms), with a less well synchronized response sometimes present (0.7-1.1 ms). There were, however, a number of significant differences between responses from normal and deafened cochleae. Electrophonic activity was only present in recordings from the normal animal, while mean threshold, dynamic range and latency of the direct electrical response varied with cochlear pathology. Differences in the ability of fibres to follow high stimulation rates were also observed; while neurons from the normal cochlea were capable of 100% entrainment at high rates (600-800 pulses per second (pps)), fibres recorded from deafened animals were often not capable of such entrainment at rates above 400 pps. Finally, a number of fibres in deafened animals showed evidence of 'bursting', in which responses rapidly alternated between high entrainment and periods of complete inactivity. This bursting pattern was presumably associated with degenerating auditory nerve fibres, since it was not recorded from the normal animal. The present study has shown that the pathological response of the cochlea following a sensorineural hearing loss can lead to a number of significant changes in the patterns of neural activity evoked via electrical stimulation. Knowledge of the extent of these changes have important implications for the clinical application of cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9213127     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00046-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  99 in total

1.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The convergence of cochlear implantation with induced pluripotent stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Niliksha Gunewardene; Mirella Dottori; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

6.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Andrew K Wise; Brianna C Thompson; Brianna O Flynn; Patrick J Atkinson; Nicole J Fretwell; James B Fallon; Gordon G Wallace; Rob K Shepherd; Graeme M Clark; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Challenges for stem cells to functionally repair the damaged auditory nerve.

Authors:  Karina Needham; Ricki L Minter; Robert K Shepherd; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.388

10.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.