Literature DB >> 12955378

Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Alexander L Babalian1, David K Ryugo, Eric M Rouiller.   

Abstract

Using the in vitro isolated whole brain preparation of the guinea pig maintained at 29 degrees C, we intracellularly recorded and stained cochlear nucleus (CN) neurons and auditory nerve (AN) fibers. Discharge properties of CN cells and AN axons were tested in response to 50-ms trains of electrical pulses delivered to the AN at rates ranging from 100 to 1000 pulses per second (pps). At low stimulation rates (200-300 pps), the discharges of AN fibers and a large proportion of principal cells (bushy, octopus, stellate) in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) followed with high probability each pulse in the train, resulting in synchronization of discharges within large populations of AN fibers and CN cells. In contrast, at high stimulation rates (500 pps and higher), AN fibers and many VCN cells exhibited "primary-like", "onset" and some other discharge patterns resembling those produced by natural sound stimuli. Unlike cells in the VCN, principal cells (pyramidal, giant) of the dorsal CN did not follow the stimulating pulses even at low rates. Instead, they often showed "pauser" and "build-up" patterns of activity, characteristic for these cells in conditions of normal hearing. We hypothesize that, at low stimulation rates, the response behavior of AN fibers and VCN cells is different from the patterns of neuronal activity related to normal auditory processing, whereas high stimulation rates produce more physiologically meaningful discharge patterns. The observed differences in discharge properties of AN fibers and CN cells at different stimulation rates can contribute to significant advantages of high- versus low-rate electrical stimulation of the AN used for coding sounds in modern cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955378     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1619-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  D A Godfrey; N Y Kiang; B E Norris
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-07-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  S B Dynes; B Delgutte
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  W S Rhode; D Oertel; P H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; M Zerbi
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Neuronal circuits associated with the output of the dorsal cochlear nucleus through fusiform cells.

Authors:  S Zhang; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus single units to electrical pulse train stimulation of the auditory nerve with a cochlear implant electrode.

Authors:  S J O'Leary; Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Mapping of the motor pathways in rats: c-fos induction by intracortical microstimulation of the motor cortex correlated with efferent connectivity of the site of cortical stimulation.

Authors:  X S Wan; F Liang; V Moret; M Wiesendanger; E M Rouiller
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  13 in total

1.  Action potential timing precision in dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Sarah E Street; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Voltage-gated potassium channel (Kv) subunits expressed in the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Zoltán Rusznák; Gábor Bakondi; Krisztina Pocsai; Agnes Pór; Lívia Kosztka; Balázs Pál; Dénes Nagy; Géza Szucs
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

4.  Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Yoojin Chung; Yi Zhou; Andrew Brughera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-22

5.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

6.  Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Charles J Limb; Christa A Baker; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Theresa Hammer; Holly-Lolan Banks; Chelsea Benson; Jing Xiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Catherine J Connelly; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Considerable differences between auditory medulla, auditory midbrain, and hippocampal synapses during sustained high-frequency stimulation: Exceptional vesicle replenishment restricted to sound localization circuit.

Authors:  Sina E Brill; Katrin Janz; Abhyudai Singh; Eckhard Friauf
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Synaptic plasticity in the medial superior olive of hearing, deaf, and cochlear-implanted cats.

Authors:  Natasha N Tirko; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.