Literature DB >> 24556536

Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Perry Twyford1, Changsi Cai, Shelley Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The field of retinal prosthetics for artificial vision has advanced considerably in recent years, however clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. The performance of retinal prostheses is likely limited by the inability of electrical stimuli to preferentially activate different types of retinal ganglion cell (RGC). APPROACH: Here we examine the response of rabbit RGCs to high-frequency stimulation, using biphasic pulses applied at 2000 pulses per second. Responses were recorded using cell-attached patch clamp methods, and stimulation was applied epiretinally via a small cone electrode. MAIN
RESULTS: When prolonged stimulus trains were applied to OFF-brisk transient (BT) RGCs, the cells exhibited a non-monotonic relationship between response strength and stimulus amplitude; this response pattern was different from those elicited previously by other electrical stimuli. When the amplitude of the stimulus was modulated transiently from a non-zero baseline amplitude, ON-BT and OFF-BT cells exhibited different activity patterns: ON cells showed an increase in activity while OFF cells exhibited a decrease in activity. Using a different envelope to modulate the amplitude of the stimulus, we observed the opposite effect: ON cells exhibited a decrease in activity while OFF cells show an increase in activity. SIGNIFICANCE: As ON and OFF RGCs often exhibit opposing activity patterns in response to light stimulation, this work suggests that high-frequency electrical stimulation of RGCs may be able to elicit responses that are more physiological than traditional pulsatile stimuli. Additionally, the prospect of an electrical stimulus capable of cell-type specific selective activation has broad applications throughout the fields of neural stimulation and neuroprostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556536      PMCID: PMC4465532          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/025001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  57 in total

1.  Effects of high-rate electrical stimulation upon firing in modelled and real neurons.

Authors:  V Krauthamer; T Crosheck
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Presynaptic inhibition modulates spillover, creating distinct dynamic response ranges of sensory output.

Authors:  Botir T Sagdullaev; Maureen A McCall; Peter D Lukasiewicz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Conduction block induced by high frequency AC stimulation in unmyelinated nerves.

Authors:  Laveeta Joseph; Benjamin D Haeffele; Robert J Butera
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

4.  Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Gregory Newkirk; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  David Tsai; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon.

Authors:  B R Bowman; D R McNeal
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1986

8.  Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways.

Authors:  P H Schiller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; M Zerbi
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  27 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Subretinal electrical stimulation reveals intact network activity in the blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Henrike Stutzki; Florian Helmhold; Max Eickenscheidt; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Increasing Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Degenerated Retina: Stimulus Waveform Design in a Multiscale Computational Model.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Robert Marc; Mark Humayun; James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.

Authors:  Vineeth Raghuram; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried; Brian P Timko
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-09-01

5.  Restoration of visual function by expression of a light-gated mammalian ion channel in retinal ganglion cells or ON-bipolar cells.

Authors:  Benjamin M Gaub; Michael H Berry; Amy E Holt; Andreas Reiner; Michael A Kienzler; Natalia Dolgova; Sergei Nikonov; Gustavo D Aguirre; William A Beltran; John G Flannery; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Bayesian inference for biophysical neuron models enables stimulus optimization for retinal neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Jonathan Oesterle; Christian Behrens; Cornelius Schröder; Thoralf Hermann; Thomas Euler; Katrin Franke; Robert G Smith; Günther Zeck; Philipp Berens
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Neuromodulation using electroosmosis.

Authors:  Sai Siva Kare; Corey M Rountree; John B Troy; John D Finan; Laxman Saggere
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Color and cellular selectivity of retinal ganglion cell subtypes through frequency modulation of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Lan Yue; Mark S Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.