Literature DB >> 11882898

Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Zachary M Smith1, Bertrand Delgutte, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

By Fourier's theorem, signals can be decomposed into a sum of sinusoids of different frequencies. This is especially relevant for hearing, because the inner ear performs a form of mechanical Fourier transform by mapping frequencies along the length of the cochlear partition. An alternative signal decomposition, originated by Hilbert, is to factor a signal into the product of a slowly varying envelope and a rapidly varying fine time structure. Neurons in the auditory brainstem sensitive to these features have been found in mammalian physiological studies. To investigate the relative perceptual importance of envelope and fine structure, we synthesized stimuli that we call 'auditory chimaeras', which have the envelope of one sound and the fine structure of another. Here we show that the envelope is most important for speech reception, and the fine structure is most important for pitch perception and sound localization. When the two features are in conflict, the sound of speech is heard at a location determined by the fine structure, but the words are identified according to the envelope. This finding reveals a possible acoustic basis for the hypothesized 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882898      PMCID: PMC2268248          DOI: 10.1038/416087a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker; B Tian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors:  O Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  B Tian; D Reser; A Durham; A Kustov; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms.

Authors:  G Langner; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study.

Authors:  P P Maeder; R A Meuli; M Adriani; A Bellmann; E Fornari; J P Thiran; A Pittet; S Clarke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  W S Rhode; D Oertel; P H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Lateralization of low-frequency, complex waveforms: the use of envelope-based temporal disparities.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of carrier and modulation frequency on lateralization based on interaural phase and interaural group delay.

Authors:  G B Henning; J Ashton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  250 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Dichotomies in the perception of speech.

Authors:  Mohinish Shukla
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Specification of cross-modal source information in isolated kinematic displays of speech.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cross-modal source information and spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.