Literature DB >> 1597606

Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

R V Shannon1.   

Abstract

Thresholds for the detection of amplitude modulation were measured in cochlear implant patients as a function of modulation frequency. Three types of threshold measures were taken: detection of amplitude modulation, detection of low-frequency sinusoidal current waveforms, and detection of beats in two-tone complexes. The temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF), defined as the plot of modulation detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency, show low-pass filter characteristics with similar cutoff frequencies for all three tasks. The similarity of these three measures suggests a common temporal mechanism. While modulation detection differs somewhat in normal-hearing and implanted listeners, both exhibit the same general characteristics. The TMTFs are low pass with a cutoff frequency near 70 Hz for normal-hearing listeners and near 140 Hz for implanted listeners. Patients with cochlear implants can best detect temporal modulation at modulation frequencies below 300 Hz, and are most sensitive to 80- to 100-Hz modulation. At high carrier levels many implant patients could detect smaller modulation amplitudes than normal-hearing listeners, a finding that is consistent with the smaller intensity DLs for some implanted listeners at high levels. These results demonstrate that, while implant listeners cannot discriminate steady-state, high-frequency stimuli, speech information might be conveyed by the envelope of the high-frequency components of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597606     DOI: 10.1121/1.403807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  63 in total

1.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

3.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.

Authors:  Dwight P Wynne; Sahara E George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

7.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.