Literature DB >> 14587606

Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Leonid M Litvak1, Zachary M Smith, Bertrand Delgutte, Donald K Eddington.   

Abstract

Rubinstein et al. [Hear. Res. 127, 108-118 (1999)] suggested that the neural representation of the waveforms of electric stimuli might be improved by introducing an ongoing, high-rate, desynchronizing pulse train (DPT). A DPT may desynchronize neural responses to electric stimulation in a manner similar to spontaneous activity in a healthy ear. To test this hypothesis, responses of auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) to 10-min-long electric pulse trains (5 kpps) were recorded from acutely deafened, anesthetized cats. Stimuli were delivered via an intracochlear electrode, and their amplitude was chosen to elicit a response in most ANFs. Responses to pulse trains showed pronounced adaptation during the first 1-2 min, followed by either a sustained response or cessation of spike discharges for the remainder of the stimulus. The adapted discharge rates showed a broad distribution across the ANF population like spontaneous activity. However, a higher proportion of fibers (46%) responded to the DPT at rates below 5 spikes/s than for spontaneous activity, and 12% of the fibers responded at higher rates than any spontaneously active fiber. Interspike interval histograms of sustained responses for some fibers had Poisson-like (exponential) shapes, resembling spontaneous activity, while others exhibited preferred intervals and, occasionally, bursting. Simultaneous recordings from pairs of fibers revealed no evidence of correlated activity, suggesting that the DPT does desynchronize the auditory nerve activity. Overall, these results suggest that responses to an ongoing DPT resemble spontaneous activity in a normal ear for a substantial fraction of the ANFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14587606      PMCID: PMC2270484          DOI: 10.1121/1.1612492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  E Javel; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  D H Johnson; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains.

Authors:  D H Perkel; G L Gerstein; G P Moore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon; R A Levine
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1970

7.  Acoustic trauma in cats. Cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity.

Authors:  M C Liberman; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1978

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Oscillation and repetitive firing in squid axons. Comparison of experiments with computations.

Authors:  R Guttman; R Barnhill
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  40 in total

1.  Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial and temporal properties of eye movements produced by electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Wangsong Gong; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

6.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

8.  Auditory sensitivity may require dynamically unstable spike generators: evidence from a model of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; H Steven Colburn; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.