Literature DB >> 10418156

Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

J E Mazur1.   

Abstract

Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which terminal-link entries were assigned to two response keys on a percentage basis. The terminal links were fixed delays that sometimes ended with food and sometimes did not. In most conditions, 80% of the terminal links were assigned to one key, but a smaller percentage of the terminal links ended with food for this key, so the number of food reinforcers delivered by the two alternatives was equal. When the same terminal-link stimuli (orange houselights) were used for both alternatives, the pigeons showed a preference for whichever alternative delivered more frequent terminal links. When different terminal-link stimuli (green vs. red houselights) were used for the two alternatives, the pigeons showed a preference for whichever alternative delivered fewer terminal links when terminal-link durations were long, and no systematic preferences when terminal-link durations were short. This pattern of results was consistent with the predictions of Grace's (1994) contextual choice model. Preference for the alternative that delivered more frequent terminal links was usually stronger in the first few sessions of a condition than at the end of a condition, suggesting that the conditioned reinforcing effect of the additional terminal-link presentation was, in part, transitory.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10418156      PMCID: PMC1284723          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

Authors:  R Dunn; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R Dunn; B Williams; P Royalty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rate of conditioned reinforcement affects observing rate but not resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Matching and conditioned reinforcement rate.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  A model of reward choice based on the theory of reinforcement learning.

Authors:  I A Smirnitskaya; A A Frolov; G Kh Merzhanova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Characteristics of behavior associated with alternative choice in a Y maze in rats and their interpretation in terms of complex probability amplitudes.

Authors:  I P Levshina; N N Shuikin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.