Literature DB >> 16811396

Choice and rate of reinforcement.

E Fantino.   

Abstract

Pigeons' responses in the presence of two concurrently available (initial-link) stimuli produced one of two different (terminal-link) stimuli. The rate of reinforcement in the presence of one terminal-link stimulus was three times that of the other. Three different pairs of identical but independent variable-interval schedules controlled entry into the terminal links. When the intermediate pair was in effect, the pigeons distributed their (choice) responses in the presence of the concurrently available stimuli of the initial links in the same proportion as reinforcements were distributed in the mutually exclusive terminal links. This finding was consistent with those of earlier studies. When either the pair of larger or smaller variable-interval schedules was in effect, however, proportions of choice responses did not match proportions of reinforcements. In addition, matching was not obtained when entry into the terminal links was controlled by unequal variable-interval schedules. A formulation consistent with extant data states that choice behavior is dependent upon the amount of reduction in the expected time to primary reinforcement, as signified by entry into one terminal link, relative to the amount of reduction in expected time to reinforcement signified by entry into the other terminal link.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811396      PMCID: PMC1338674          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A method for increasing the reinforcement magnitude of intracranial stimulation.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; T D Hawkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.

Authors:  E Fantino; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  161 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.

Authors:  M E Andrzejewski; D P Field; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.

Authors:  M A McDevitt; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

10.  Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.

Authors:  J A Nevin; R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.