Literature DB >> 3625101

Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.

R Dunn, B Williams, P Royalty.   

Abstract

Pigeons were presented a concurrent-chains schedule of reinforcement that had terminal links of equal duration. The initial links of the schedule were periodically interrupted by 15-s periods during which an extinction schedule was in effect. The extinction periods were presented on either a response-contingent or a noncontingent basis. Relative response rate for the left alternative decreased when the extinction periods were accompanied by the left terminal-link stimulus. Relative response rate for the right alternative decreased when the extinction periods were accompanied by the right terminal-link stimulus. Relative response rate varied inversely with the frequency of presentation of the extinction periods but was unaffected by presence versus absence of the response contingency in the schedule of extinction-period presentation. Furthermore, relative response rate was unaffected by presentation of extinction periods accompanied by a novel stimulus. When the extinction periods were presented after reinforcement in the left terminal link instead of as interruptions of the initial links, relative response rate for the left alternative was reduced if the postreinforcement extinction period was accompanied by the terminal-link stimulus for the left chain and reduced less if the extinction period was accompanied by the terminal-link stimulus for the right chain. The results demonstrate that the correlation between the terminal-link stimulus and extinction influenced the relative response rate in the initial link.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625101      PMCID: PMC1338747          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The psychological distance to reward.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects on preference of reinforcement delay, number of reinforcers, and terminal-link duration.

Authors:  W R Poniewaz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt De Sá
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.

Authors:  M L Spetch; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-10
View more
  20 in total

1.  Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Substitutability between conditioned and primary reinforcers in discrimination acquisition.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.