| Literature DB >> 17575906 |
Edmund Fantino1, Paul Romanowich.
Abstract
We review the nature of conditioned reinforcement, including evidence that conditioned reinforcers maintain choice behavior in concurrent schedules and that they elevate responding in the terminal links of concurrent-chains schedules. A question has resurfaced recently: Do theories of choice in concurrent-chains schedules need to include a term reflecting greater preference for higher rates of conditioned reinforcement? The review of several studies addressing this point suggests that such a term is inappropriate. Elevated rates of conditioned reinforcement (and responding) in the terminal links of concurrent-chains schedules do not lead to greater preference in the initial link leading to the higher rate of conditioned reinforcement. If anything, the opposite preference is likely to occur. This result is not surprising, since the additional putative conditioned reinforcers in the terminal link are not correlated with a reduction in time to primary reinforcement nor with an increase in value.Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17575906 PMCID: PMC1868584 DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.44-06
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Anal Behav ISSN: 0022-5002 Impact factor: 2.468