Literature DB >> 20885815

Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Timothy A Shahan1.   

Abstract

Stimuli associated with primary reinforcers appear themselves to acquire the capacity to strengthen behavior. This paper reviews research on the strengthening effects of conditioned reinforcers within the context of contemporary quantitative choice theories and behavioral momentum theory. Based partially on the finding that variations in parameters of conditioned reinforcement appear not to affect response strength as measured by resistance to change, long-standing assertions that conditioned reinforcers do not strengthen behavior in a reinforcement-like fashion are considered. A signposts or means-to-an-end account is explored and appears to provide a plausible alternative interpretation of the effects of stimuli associated with primary reinforcers. Related suggestions that primary reinforcers also might not have their effects via a strengthening process are explored and found to be worthy of serious consideration.

Keywords:  behavioral momentum theory; choice; conditioned reinforcement; means to an end; observing; resistance to change; response strength; signpost; token

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20885815      PMCID: PMC2831656          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  52 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resistance to extinction in the steady state and in transition.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

4.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D E Mulvaney; A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  13 in total

1.  Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On Multiscaled and Unified.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

4.  Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-06-11

5.  Do pigeons prefer information in the absence of differential reinforcement?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jessica P Stagner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.

Authors:  Kathleen A Mangiapanello; Nancy S Hemmes
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-01-14

8.  Perhaps More Consideration of Pavlovian-Operant Interaction May Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Behaviorally Based Drug Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013

9.  Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.