Literature DB >> 2324663

Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

R Dunn1, M L Spetch.   

Abstract

Pigeons responded on concurrent chains with equal initial- and terminal-link durations. In all conditions, the terminal links of one chain ended reliably in reinforcement; the terminal links on the alternative chain ended in either food or blackout. In Experiment 1, the terminal-link stimuli were correlated with (signaled) the outcome, and the durations of the initial and terminal links were varied across conditions. Preference did not vary systematically across conditions. In Experiment 2, terminal-link durations were varied under different stimulus conditions. The initial links were variable-interval 80-s schedules. Preference for the reliable alternative was generally higher in unsignaled than in signaled conditions. Preference increased with terminal-link durations only in the unsignaled conditions. There were no consistent differences between conditions with and without a common signal for reinforcement on the two chains. In the first series of conditions in Experiment 3, a single response was required in the initial links, and the stimulus conditions during 50-s terminal links were varied. Preference for the reliable outcome approached 1.0 in unsignaled conditions and was considerably lower (below .50 for 3 of 5 subjects) in signaled conditions. In a final series of signaled conditions with relatively long terminal links, preference varied with duration of the initial links. The results extend previous findings and are discussed in terms of the delay reduction signaled by terminal-link stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2324663      PMCID: PMC1323007          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

2.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.

Authors:  M L Spetch; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H Kaye; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1984-01
View more
  27 in total

1.  Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The paradox of preference for unreliable reinforcement: The role of context and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  J S Lalli; B C Mauro
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

7.  Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; James W Diller; Malvina O Pietrzykowski
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Holly C Miller; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Authors:  U Stockhorst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.