Literature DB >> 18304761

Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Timothy A Shahan1, Christopher A Podlesnik.   

Abstract

We review recent experiments examining whether simple models of the allocation and persistence of operant behavior are applicable to attending. In one series of experiments, observing responses of pigeons were used as an analog of attending. Maintenance of observing is often attributed to the conditioned reinforcing effects of a food-correlated stimulus (i.e., S+), so these experiments also may inform our understanding of conditioned reinforcement. Rates and allocations of observing were governed by rates of food or S+ delivery in a manner consistent with the matching law. Resistance to change of observing was well described by behavioral momentum theory only when rates of primary reinforcement in the context were considered. Rate and value of S+ deliveries did not affect resistance to change. Thus, persistence of attending to stimuli appears to be governed by primary reinforcement rates in the training context rather than conditioned reinforcing effects of the stimuli. An additional implication of these findings is that conditioned "reinforcers" may affect response rates through some mechanism other than response-strengthening. In a second series of experiments, we examined the applicability of the matching law to the allocation of attending to the elements of compound stimuli in a divided-attention task. The generalized matching law described performance well, and sensitivity to relative reinforcement varied with sample duration. The bias and sensitivity terms of the generalized matching law may provide measures of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control of divided attention. Further application of theories of operant behavior to performance on attention tasks may provide insights into what is referred to variously as endogenous, top-down, or goal-directed control of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18304761      PMCID: PMC2418644          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  47 in total

1.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Selective and divided attention in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Divided attention performance and the matching law.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Resistance to change and frequency of response-dependent stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Authors:  Stephanie Gomes-Ng; Douglas Elliffe; Sarah Cowie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

6.  Differential reinforcement and resistance to change of divided-attention performance.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Eric Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism.

Authors:  Lee Mason; Maria Otero; Alonzo Andrews
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.