Literature DB >> 20885807

Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Margaret A McDevitt1, Ben A Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which the total time to primary reinforcement was equated for the two alternatives (VI 30 s VI 60 s vs. VI 60 s VI 30 s). In one set of conditions, the terminal links were signaled by the same stimulus, and in another set of conditions they were signaled by different stimuli. Choice was in favor of the shorter terminal link when the terminal links were differentially signaled but in favor of the shorter initial link (and longer terminal link) when the terminal links shared the same stimulus. Preference reversed regularly with reversals of the stimulus condition and was unrelated to the discrimination between the two terminal links during the nondifferential stimulus condition. The present results suggest that the relative value of the terminal-link stimuli and the relative rate of conditioned reinforcer presentation are important influences on choice behavior, and that models of conditioned reinforcement need to include both factors.

Keywords:  choice; concurrent chains; conditioned reinforcement; key peck; pigeon

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20885807      PMCID: PMC2831654          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Time, rate, and conditioning.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching and conditioned reinforcement rate.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; S Fairhurst; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Delay reduction: current status.

Authors:  E Fantino; R A Preston; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Theory and Behavior Analysis.

Authors:  John W Donahoe
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

2.  Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Perhaps More Consideration of Pavlovian-Operant Interaction May Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Behaviorally Based Drug Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.