Literature DB >> 2002301

Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

B A Williams1, R Dunn.   

Abstract

Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which both choice alternatives led to the same terminal-link stimulus, which was followed by food. Superimposed on the food-reinforced presentations of the terminal-link stimulus was a second schedule of presentations of the same stimulus that were followed by no food. The absolute number of these no-food stimulus presentations was held constant while their relative frequency assigned to one or the other choice alternative was systematically varied. Preference for a given choice alternative tracked the relative frequency of these stimulus presentations, thus demonstrating that they served as reinforcers. These results resolve conflicts in the literature regarding the effect of conditioned reinforcement on choice.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2002301      PMCID: PMC1322976          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; S Fairhurst; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  27 in total

1.  Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; Stan B Floresco; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rate of conditioned reinforcement affects observing rate but not resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.