Literature DB >> 7714448

Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

J E Mazur1.   

Abstract

In an adjusting-delay choice procedure, pigeons could peck on either a red key or a green key. A peck on the red key always led to a delay associated with red houselights and then food. The delay was adjusted over trials to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two keys were chosen about equally often. In some conditions, a peck on the green key led to food on all trials after delays of either 10 s or 30 s, and green houselights were lit during the delays. In other conditions, food was presented on only half of the green-key trials. If the green houselights continued to occur on both reinforcement and nonreinforcement trials, preference for the green key always decreased. Preference for the green key also decreased if half of the trials had 30-s houselights followed by food and the other half had no green houselights and no food. However, preference for the green key actually increased if half of the trials had 10-s green houselights followed by food and the other half had no green houselights followed by no food. The latter condition therefore demonstrated a case in which preference for an alternative increased when food was removed from half of the trials. The results suggest that the red and green houselights served as conditioned reinforcers. A hyperbolic decay model (Mazur, 1989) provided good predictions for all conditions by assuming that the strength of a conditioned reinforcer is inversely related to the total time spent in its presence before food is delivered.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714448      PMCID: PMC1334392          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Subjective probability and delay.

Authors:  H Rachlin; A Raineri; D Cross
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Rodriguez; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-01
View more
  23 in total

1.  Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures.

Authors:  Timothy D Hackenberg; Manish Vaidya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Influence of temporal context on value in the multiple-chains and successive-encounters procedures.

Authors:  Matthew O'Daly; Samuel Angulo; Cassandra Gipson; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; John J Leddy; Jennifer L Temple; Myles S Faith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Holly C Miller; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Context effects on choice.

Authors:  J N Goldshmidt; K M Lattal; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.